Dnia 30-08-2005, wto o godzinie 01:37 +0200, Jakub Piotr Cłapa
napisał(a):
> Patrys :: Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
> > Here it looks like pure cosmetics (no execution prior to testing $?) but
> > it is more convenient to save it so if one adds one more instruction in
> > the conditional block it continu
Patrys :: Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
> Here it looks like pure cosmetics (no execution prior to testing $?) but
> it is more convenient to save it so if one adds one more instruction in
> the conditional block it continues to work.
That's what I though (but OTOH I changed it after getting a syslog
me
Dnia 30-08-2005, wto o godzinie 01:19 +0200, Jakub Piotr Cłapa
napisał(a):
> jpc wrote:
> > Index: SOURCES/go7007-hotplug.patch
> > diff -u /dev/null SOURCES/go7007-hotplug.patch:1.1
> > --- /dev/null Mon Aug 29 14:13:55 2005
> > +++ SOURCES/go7007-hotplug.patchMon Aug 29 14:13:50 2005
>
jpc wrote:
> Index: SOURCES/go7007-hotplug.patch
> diff -u /dev/null SOURCES/go7007-hotplug.patch:1.1
> --- /dev/null Mon Aug 29 14:13:55 2005
> +++ SOURCES/go7007-hotplug.patch Mon Aug 29 14:13:50 2005
> @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
> +--- wis-go7007-linux-0.9.6/hotplug/wis-ezusb.in~ 2005-08-04
> 04
