Re: SPECS: vte.spec - broken, rel. down to 0.1

2005-08-04 Thread Paweł Sakowski
On Wed, 2005-08-03 at 18:03 +0200, Fryderyk Dziarmagowski wrote: If you elaborate what it is that you find broken, there's a chance that someone will fix it. sending a problem description to authors it's not sufficient? should I cc you with every problem I've found? and I don't belive that

Re: SPECS: vte.spec - broken, rel. down to 0.1

2005-08-04 Thread Artur Flinta
Dnia 04-08-2005, czw o godzinie 11:05 +0200, Paweł Sakowski napisał(a): One of previous commiter screwed up the upgrade, doesn't build, this version crashes in the commit log would have made me happy. But glib was broken, not vte. Artur -- Każdy problem ma swoje rozwiązanie, jeżeli nie ma

Re: SPECS: vte.spec - broken, rel. down to 0.1

2005-08-03 Thread Paweł Sakowski
On Wed, 2005-08-03 at 16:19 +0200, freetz wrote: $Log$ +Revision 1.77 2005/08/03 14:19:04 freetz +- broken, rel. down to 0.1 + Revision 1.76 2005/08/03 08:53:52 aflinta - up to version 0.11.14 If you elaborate what it is that you find broken, there's a chance that someone will fix

Re: SPECS: vte.spec - broken, rel. down to 0.1

2005-08-03 Thread Fryderyk Dziarmagowski
--- Paweł Sakowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 2005-08-03 at 16:19 +0200, freetz wrote: $Log$ +Revision 1.77 2005/08/03 14:19:04 freetz +- broken, rel. down to 0.1 + Revision 1.76 2005/08/03 08:53:52 aflinta - up to version 0.11.14 If you elaborate what it is that you

Re: SPECS: vte.spec - broken, rel. down to 0.1

2005-08-03 Thread Bartosz Taudul
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 06:03:15PM +0200, Fryderyk Dziarmagowski wrote: +Revision 1.77 2005/08/03 14:19:04 freetz +- broken, rel. down to 0.1 If you elaborate what it is that you find broken, there's a chance that someone will fix it. sending a problem description to authors it's not

Re: SPECS: vte.spec - broken, rel. down to 0.1

2005-08-03 Thread wrobell
On Wed, 2005-08-03 at 18:03 +0200, Fryderyk Dziarmagowski wrote: --- Paweł Sakowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 2005-08-03 at 16:19 +0200, freetz wrote: $Log$ +Revision 1.77 2005/08/03 14:19:04 freetz +- broken, rel. down to 0.1 + Revision 1.76 2005/08/03 08:53:52

Re: SPECS: vte.spec - broken, rel. down to 0.1

2005-08-03 Thread Fryderyk Dziarmagowski
--- Bartosz Taudul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +Revision 1.77 2005/08/03 14:19:04 freetz +- broken, rel. down to 0.1 If you elaborate what it is that you find broken, there's a chance that someone will fix it. sending a problem description to authors it's not sufficient? should I

Re: SPECS: vte.spec - broken, rel. down to 0.1

2005-08-03 Thread Fryderyk Dziarmagowski
--- wrobell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +Revision 1.77 2005/08/03 14:19:04 freetz +- broken, rel. down to 0.1 + Revision 1.76 2005/08/03 08:53:52 aflinta - up to version 0.11.14 If you elaborate what it is that you find broken, there's a chance that someone will

Re: SPECS: vte.spec - broken, rel. down to 0.1

2005-08-03 Thread wrobell
On Wed, 2005-08-03 at 18:45 +0200, Fryderyk Dziarmagowski wrote: --- Bartosz Taudul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +Revision 1.77 2005/08/03 14:19:04 freetz +- broken, rel. down to 0.1 If you elaborate what it is that you find broken, there's a chance that someone will fix it.

Re: SPECS: vte.spec - broken, rel. down to 0.1

2005-08-03 Thread Bartosz Taudul
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 06:45:59PM +0200, Fryderyk Dziarmagowski wrote: don't like my commits? feel free to report a abuse to PLD CDG. Not yet. wolf -- Bartek . - Będzie was obowiązywało (...) Nie na jutro broń boże, tylko Taudul :na pojutrze.