On 18.09.2015 22:57, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote:
On Friday 18 of September 2015, Tomasz Pala wrote:
I've been searching this for an hour now but can't find any discussion on
this - why do we have (rpm/macros.pld.in)
%_ssp_cflags-fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4
instead superior
On Friday 18 of September 2015, Tomasz Pala wrote:
> I've been searching this for an hour now but can't find any discussion on
> this - why do we have (rpm/macros.pld.in)
>
> %_ssp_cflags -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4
>
> instead superior -fstack-protector-strong which seems to be
I've been searching this for an hour now but can't find any discussion on
this - why do we have (rpm/macros.pld.in)
%_ssp_cflags-fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4
instead superior -fstack-protector-strong which seems to be taken as
default in many distros, even on gcc level?
--
