On Sun, 22 May 2005 09:36:16 +0200, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
>
> Or you can use crosssparc64-{binutils,gcc}.
> (just rpmbuild kernel*.spec --target sparc64-pld-linux)
>
I already have a biarch gcc before crosssparc64 was even built.
> I have some unofficial (but working at least on Ultra1) builds of
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 06:38:59PM -0700, Chris Poon wrote:
> Any specifics on why it would be unlikely to become official? Like lack of
> testing and such? I don't seem find any official 64 bit kernel RPM release.
> The first I find is that I need a biarch gcc before I can easily build a
> 64 bit
Any specifics on why it would be unlikely to become official? Like lack of
testing and such? I don't seem find any official 64 bit kernel RPM release.
The first I find is that I need a biarch gcc before I can easily build a
64 bit kernel, and I do have a patch lying around that will produce a biarc
Chris Poon wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have noticed that there doesn't seem to be a 64 bit kernel or biarch gcc
> for Ac Sparc/Sparc64. I'm wondering if there was any intention for a Sparc64
> release, and if not what is the reasoning behind it. I have been able to build
> an UltraSPARC on my own after
Hi,
I have noticed that there doesn't seem to be a 64 bit kernel or biarch gcc
for Ac Sparc/Sparc64. I'm wondering if there was any intention for a Sparc64
release, and if not what is the reasoning behind it. I have been able to build
an UltraSPARC on my own after some major hacking to produce a 6
