> Why don't we just update all specs on HEAD and DEVEL using some
> automagic awk script? If Provides work it should works too.
I'm not an awk-guru :)
Zsolt
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailm
On Wed, 25 Nov 2009, Zsolt Udvari wrote:
> > i update git-core.spec, i don't know a sh*t of tetex* crapolla. so i
> > just disable the doc building then? i care for git-core as a program,
> > not the madness behind documentation building. so i as git-core
> > updater don't now anything which tetex
> i update git-core.spec, i don't know a sh*t of tetex* crapolla. so i
> just disable the doc building then? i care for git-core as a program,
> not the madness behind documentation building. so i as git-core
> updater don't now anything which tetex is needed or is needed not
> whatsoever.
Ask me
On Wednesday 25 November 2009 18:02:50 Zsolt Udvari wrote:
> > isn't this this is too complicated for average developer (tm)?
>
> Hm? I don't understand you. If a developer ("package maintainer")
> updates and cares about foo.spec, (s)he knows that this package needs
> or not any tetex-package.
i
> > From the "developers": I want that the package "maintainers" check
> > his/her packages and their (build)requires and if necessary, update
> > the depends from tetex to texlive and increment the release (and
> > test the package, of course ;))
> >
> > From the "users" (and "developers" too ;)):
On Wednesday 25 November 2009 10:51:15 Zsolt Udvari wrote:
> So, what I want?
>
> From the "developers": I want that the package "maintainers" check
> his/her packages and their (build)requires and if necessary, update
> the depends from tetex to texlive and increment the release (and test
> the pa
Hi all!
I'm working on TeXLive2009 and when anybody follows the changes, can
see, that I'm splitting the texlive packages to a noarch and an
arch-depend part (texlive-texmf.spec and texlive.spec). The packages
names don't change (not will be e.g. texlive-texmf-latex-math or
similar, only texlive-l
