Re: exfat

2015-01-12 Thread Jakub Bogusz
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 12:39:57AM +0300, Michael Shigorin wrote: > On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 07:20:10PM +0100, Jakub Bogusz wrote: > > > exfat-utils-1.0.1-1.x86_64.rpm > > > fuse-exfat-1.0.1-3.x86_64.rpm > > At most S: fuse-exfat in fuse-exfat... > > S: fuse

Re: exfat

2015-01-12 Thread Michael Shigorin
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 07:20:10PM +0100, Jakub Bogusz wrote: > > exfat-utils-1.0.1-1.x86_64.rpm > > fuse-exfat-1.0.1-3.x86_64.rpm > At most S: fuse-exfat in fuse-exfat... S: fuse-exfat in exfat-utils? --   WBR, Michael Shigorin / http://altlinux.org   -- http://opennet.r

Re: exfat

2015-01-10 Thread Jakub Bogusz
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 07:55:55PM +0200, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > there are two packages on ftp: > > exfat-utils-1.0.1-1.x86_64.rpm > fuse-exfat-1.0.1-3.x86_64.rpm > > any ideas why the split? Upstream decided to split them. > as i have to install both to use exfat moun

exfat

2015-01-10 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
there are two packages on ftp: exfat-utils-1.0.1-1.x86_64.rpm fuse-exfat-1.0.1-3.x86_64.rpm any ideas why the split? as i have to install both to use exfat mounts properly... there's even no suggests to suggest the other package, should it be added? to which one of them? http://gi