On Sun, Nov 19, 2006 at 08:43:31PM +0100, Tomasz Wittner wrote:
> On Tue 14. November 2006 01:40, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> > file 4.18 began to recognize libtool files (*.la):
> >
> > /usr/lib/librpm.la: libtool library file
> > (instead of "ASCII English text" like before)
> >
> > and it appears to
On Nov 19, 2006, at 2:43 PM, Tomasz Wittner wrote:
> On Tue 14. November 2006 01:40, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
>> file 4.18 began to recognize libtool files (*.la):
>>
>> /usr/lib/librpm.la: libtool library file
>> (instead of "ASCII English text" like before)
>>
>> and it appears to enable libtool dep
On Tue 14. November 2006 01:40, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> file 4.18 began to recognize libtool files (*.la):
>
> /usr/lib/librpm.la: libtool library file
> (instead of "ASCII English text" like before)
>
> and it appears to enable libtool dependencies autodetection in rpm.
> Should be use it or disab
On Tuesday 14 November 2006 01:40, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> file 4.18 began to recognize libtool files (*.la):
>
> /usr/lib/librpm.la: libtool library file
> (instead of "ASCII English text" like before)
>
> and it appears to enable libtool dependencies autodetection in rpm.
> Should be use it or disa
file 4.18 began to recognize libtool files (*.la):
/usr/lib/librpm.la: libtool library file
(instead of "ASCII English text" like before)
and it appears to enable libtool dependencies autodetection in rpm.
Should be use it or disable it?
If we decide to use it, then:
- all packages with *.la wil
