On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 08:15:40PM +0200, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> On Wednesday 29 April 2009 13:55:40 Mariusz Mazur wrote:
> > I just did a server-side read-only SPECS that's full of symlinks to
> > the ../packages spec files. I've also added a small monitoring script that
> > will rename/delete/cre
On Wednesday 29 April 2009 13:55:40 Mariusz Mazur wrote:
> I just did a server-side read-only SPECS that's full of symlinks to
> the ../packages spec files. I've also added a small monitoring script that
> will rename/delete/create new symlinks whenever a directory in packages/
> gets created/delet
On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 11:42:44 +0200, Tomasz Pala wrote:
>>> It would be nice if there were Attic subdirectory for deleted symlinks.
>>
>> What for? It's not like they would be pointing to anything.
>
> They could point to packages//Attic/.
>
>>> Oh, and I've just realized I've sometimes used
On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 09:11:44 +0200, Mariusz Mazur wrote:
>> It would be nice if there were Attic subdirectory for deleted symlinks.
>
> What for? It's not like they would be pointing to anything.
They could point to packages//Attic/.
>> Oh, and I've just realized I've sometimes used flat SO
Dnia niedziela, 3 maja 2009, Tomasz Pala napisał:
> It would be nice if there were Attic subdirectory for deleted symlinks.
What for? It's not like they would be pointing to anything.
> Oh, and I've just realized I've sometimes used flat SOURCES to find some
> files matching pattern (like every l
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 12:55:40 +0200, Mariusz Mazur wrote:
> I just did a server-side read-only SPECS that's full of symlinks to
> the ../packages spec files. I've also added a small monitoring script that
> will rename/delete/
It would be nice if there were Attic subdirectory for deleted sym
Dnia środa, 29 kwietnia 2009, Elan Ruusamäe napisał:
> > packages/builder, just don't tell anyone :)
>
> no, i mean the _other_ files in that list...
> http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/pipermail/pld-devel-en/2009-April/021049
>.html
Dunno. If some of them are still useful, just copy them from SP
On Wednesday 29 April 2009 14:23:50 Mariusz Mazur wrote:
> Dnia środa, 29 kwietnia 2009, Elan Ruusamäe napisał:
> > if it's not big secret, then what is the new place?
>
> packages/builder, just don't tell anyone :)
no, i mean the _other_ files in that list...
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/pi
Dnia środa, 29 kwietnia 2009, Elan Ruusamäe napisał:
> if it's not big secret, then what is the new place?
packages/builder, just don't tell anyone :)
--mmazur
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mai
On Wednesday 29 April 2009 14:13:03 Mariusz Mazur wrote:
> Dnia środa, 29 kwietnia 2009, Elan Ruusamäe napisał:
> > On Wednesday 29 April 2009 13:55:40 Mariusz Mazur wrote:
> > > I just did a server-side read-only SPECS that's full of symlinks to
> > > the ../packages spec files.
> >
> > doing cvs
Dnia środa, 29 kwietnia 2009, Elan Ruusamäe napisał:
> On Wednesday 29 April 2009 13:55:40 Mariusz Mazur wrote:
> > I just did a server-side read-only SPECS that's full of symlinks to
> > the ../packages spec files.
>
> doing cvs up revealed what other non-spec files were present, where they
> are
On Wednesday 29 April 2009 13:55:40 Mariusz Mazur wrote:
> I just did a server-side read-only SPECS that's full of symlinks to
> the ../packages spec files.
doing cvs up revealed what other non-spec files were present, where they are
now?
g...@builder-ac pld/SPECS $ grep 'is no longer' /tmp/ss
I just did a server-side read-only SPECS that's full of symlinks to
the ../packages spec files. I've also added a small monitoring script that
will rename/delete/create new symlinks whenever a directory in packages/ gets
created/deleted/renamed.
Enjoy.
--mmazur
Oh, and I'll use this mail as b
13 matches
Mail list logo
