On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 03:49:51PM +0200, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 05:46:52PM +0200, Kacper Kornet wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 05:10:32PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> > > On 10.09.2012 20:45, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> > > >On Sat, Sep 08, 2012 at 10:08:36PM +0200, Jakub Bog
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 05:46:52PM +0200, Kacper Kornet wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 05:10:32PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> > On 10.09.2012 20:45, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> > >On Sat, Sep 08, 2012 at 10:08:36PM +0200, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> > >>>What is the procedure to rename already existing (al
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 05:10:32PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> On 10.09.2012 20:45, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> >On Sat, Sep 08, 2012 at 10:08:36PM +0200, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> >>>What is the procedure to rename already existing (also on ftp) package
> >>>after moving to git?
> >>>cvs2git howto says "
On 10.09.2012 20:45, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
On Sat, Sep 08, 2012 at 10:08:36PM +0200, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
>What is the procedure to rename already existing (also on ftp) package
>after moving to git?
>
>cvs2git howto says "ssh git@... move ... ..." instead of rename -
>is it appropriate for such ca
On Sat, Sep 08, 2012 at 10:08:36PM +0200, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> What is the procedure to rename already existing (also on ftp) package
> after moving to git?
>
> cvs2git howto says "ssh git@... move ... ..." instead of rename -
> is it appropriate for such case (would old package be accessible usi
What is the procedure to rename already existing (also on ftp) package
after moving to git?
cvs2git howto says "ssh git@... move ... ..." instead of rename -
is it appropriate for such case (would old package be accessible using
old name/auto tag?) - in cvs cp was invoked instead of mv.
Or should
