use them for glibc
> > > now...
> >
> > I fail to understand why we want them in glibc.spec so badly.
> > man-pages.spec providing them is more sane to me.
>
> To get ldconfig manuals together with ldconfig, similarly for ldd,
> getconf etc. - just like in
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 09:28:47PM +0200, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote:
> On Saturday 12 of July 2014, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 06:42:46PM +0200, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote:
> > > Hi. There are outdated manual pages in glibc.spec:
> > > Source5:http://qboosh.pl/man/%{na
On Saturday 12 of July 2014, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 06:42:46PM +0200, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote:
> > Hi. There are outdated manual pages in glibc.spec:
> > Source5:http://qboosh.pl/man/%{name}-man-pages.tar.bz2
> >
> > So the question is - do we really want them the
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 06:42:46PM +0200, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote:
>
> Hi. There are outdated manual pages in glibc.spec:
> Source5:http://qboosh.pl/man/%{name}-man-pages.tar.bz2
>
> So the question is - do we really want them there? man-pages project have
> updated version, so why we
Hi. There are outdated manual pages in glibc.spec:
Source5:http://qboosh.pl/man/%{name}-man-pages.tar.bz2
So the question is - do we really want them there? man-pages project have
updated version, so why we don't use these pages from man-pages?
example strtoll page
--
Arkadiusz Miśkie
