Re: openswan.spec up to 2.6.28

2010-08-19 Thread Marcin Rybak
2010/8/18 Caleb Maclennan > You might look at the following messages and consider if either of > these should get packaged, particularly the index.html file under > docs? Or is this a duplication of docs in another format? Just > something to consider in the future. > > - > Checking for u

Re: openswan.spec up to 2.6.28

2010-08-18 Thread Caleb Maclennan
2010/8/18 Marcin Rybak : > Updated to 2.6.28 (changelog: http://www.openswan.org/download/CHANGES ), I committed for you at rev 1.50, and thanks for contributing. You might look at the following messages and consider if either of these should get packaged, particularly the index.html file under d

openswan.spec up to 2.6.28

2010-08-18 Thread Marcin Rybak
Updated to 2.6.28 (changelog: http://www.openswan.org/download/CHANGES ), builds and works at Ti with kernel-2.6.32.15-1.i686 My first spec edit :) Best regards, --- Marcin Rybak http://marcinrybak.com openswan.spec Description: Binary data ___ pld-de