On 05.10.2016 11:04, Paweł A. Gajda wrote:
On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 10:02 AM, Paweł A. Gajda wrote:
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 6:25 PM, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
i tried this hack:
bash-4.3# echo /etc/rc.d/init.d >> /etc/rpm/sysinfo/Dirnames
Would not help as "path" dependencies are resolved based
On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 10:02 AM, Paweł A. Gajda wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 6:25 PM, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
>
>>
>> i tried this hack:
>>
>> bash-4.3# echo /etc/rc.d/init.d >> /etc/rpm/sysinfo/Dirnames
>
>
> Would not help as "path" dependencies are resolved based on package
> contents, in fac
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 6:25 PM, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
>
> i tried this hack:
>
> bash-4.3# echo /etc/rc.d/init.d >> /etc/rpm/sysinfo/Dirnames
Would not help as "path" dependencies are resolved based on package
contents, in fact rpm/poldek does not care if file/dir really exists.
i tried this hack:
bash-4.3# echo /etc/rc.d/init.d >> /etc/rpm/sysinfo/Dirnames
but deps pulled rc-scripts. poldek bug?
On 04.10.2016 19:23, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
one option would be just add /etc/rc.d/init.d dir to filesystem.spec
On 04.10.2016 19:21, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
back to that,
an
one option would be just add /etc/rc.d/init.d dir to filesystem.spec
On 04.10.2016 19:21, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
back to that,
any objections for the split to make our packaging more docker friendly?
On 13.05.2016 19:24, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
i was thinking adding tzdata-zoneinfo subpackage, t
back to that,
any objections for the split to make our packaging more docker friendly?
On 13.05.2016 19:24, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
i was thinking adding tzdata-zoneinfo subpackage, this way wouldn't
break any existing installations,
altho clearly tzdata-init would be better package name.
or a
i was thinking adding tzdata-zoneinfo subpackage, this way wouldn't
break any existing installations,
altho clearly tzdata-init would be better package name.
or add tzdata-init and tzdata require tzdata-init for some undefined
migration time?
On 06.05.2016 18:52, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
so, i
