On Apr 24, 2016, at 3:20 PM, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> On 24.04.2016 21:08, Jeff Johnson wrote:
>> The fix is --without-sasl2 (not --without-sasl). My brain fart, now verified.
>
> thanks. indeed that's the option.
>
> seems libacl is also new library dependency. is there appropriate
> functional
On 24.04.2016 21:08, Jeff Johnson wrote:
The fix is --without-sasl2 (not --without-sasl). My brain fart, now verified.
thanks. indeed that's the option.
seems libacl is also new library dependency. is there appropriate
functionality or it also slipped in somehow?
[~/rpm/packages/rpm(5.4.16
On Apr 24, 2016, at 12:49 PM, Jeff Johnson wrote:
>
> On Apr 24, 2016, at 12:32 PM, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
>
>> On 24.04.2016 18:28, Jeff Johnson wrote:
>>> So specifiying --without-sasl when building is the only (well you could
>>> configure/install sasl
>>> correctly before executing rpm too)
On Apr 24, 2016, at 12:49 PM, Jeff Johnson wrote:
>
> (aside)
> BTW, there is one other 1-line patch to rpmio/pkgio.c needed to plug a 16b
> memory leak
> in rdSignature(). The final code should look like
>
> ...
>/* All packages should have RPMSIGTAG_MD5. */
>he->tag = (rpmTa
On Apr 24, 2016, at 12:32 PM, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> On 24.04.2016 18:28, Jeff Johnson wrote:
>> So specifiying --without-sasl when building is the only (well you could
>> configure/install sasl
>> correctly before executing rpm too) way to remove the syslog'd message.
>
> added, did not help.
On 24.04.2016 18:28, Jeff Johnson wrote:
So specifiying --without-sasl when building is the only (well you could
configure/install sasl
correctly before executing rpm too) way to remove the syslog'd message.
added, did not help. did not investigate further, but build log is
available:
http
On Apr 24, 2016, at 10:41 AM, Jeff Johnson wrote:
>>
>> something logs to syslog at this time:
>> Apr 24 12:48:27 new-server rpm: looking for plugins in '/usr/lib/sasl2',
>> failed to open directory, error: No such file or directory
>>
>
> That message isn't coming from RPM afaik.
>
The mes
On Apr 24, 2016, at 6:03 AM, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> On 24.04.2016 12:51, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
>>
>> anyway, i finally installed the built version. the sasl2 error is probably
>> from somewhere else.
>>
>> 12:48:25 root[load: 0.00]@new-server /# rpm -q rpm
>> rpm-5.4.16-0.1.i686
> There are 1
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Elan Ruusamäe
> Subject: Re: rpm-5.4.16 snapshot
> Date: April 24, 2016 5:51:58 AM EDT
> To: "PLD: Developers list (English)"
> Reply-To: "PLD: Developers list (English)"
>
> On 20.04.2016 15:38, Jeff Johnson wrote
On 24.04.2016 12:51, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
anyway, i finally installed the built version. the sasl2 error is
probably from somewhere else.
12:48:25 root[load: 0.00]@new-server /# rpm -q rpm
rpm-5.4.16-0.1.i686
There are 1 package to install, 1 to remove:
I filesystem-4.0-46.i686
R filesystem
On 20.04.2016 15:38, Jeff Johnson wrote:
There is a final snapshot release of rpm-5.4.16 now available at
http://rpm5.org/files/rpm/rpm-5.4/SNAPSHOT/rpm-5.4.16-0.20160420.src.rpm
baggins, could you take care of the last remaining patches on
dev-5.4.16. those are both yours and i don't
On Apr 20, 2016, at 11:05 AM, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> On 20.04.2016 18:01, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
>> On 20.04.2016 15:38, Jeff Johnson wrote:
>>> There is a final snapshot release of rpm-5.4.16 now available at
>>>
>>>http://rpm5.org/files/rpm/rpm-5.4/SNAPSHOT/rpm-5.4.16-0.20160420.src.rpm
>>
On 20.04.2016 18:01, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
On 20.04.2016 15:38, Jeff Johnson wrote:
There is a final snapshot release of rpm-5.4.16 now available at
http://rpm5.org/files/rpm/rpm-5.4/SNAPSHOT/rpm-5.4.16-0.20160420.src.rpm
so this did got finally addressed?
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mai
On 20.04.2016 15:38, Jeff Johnson wrote:
There is a final snapshot release of rpm-5.4.16 now available at
http://rpm5.org/files/rpm/rpm-5.4/SNAPSHOT/rpm-5.4.16-0.20160420.src.rpm
so this did got finally addressed?
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/pipermail/pld-devel-en/2015-November
There is a final snapshot release of rpm-5.4.16 now available at
http://rpm5.org/files/rpm/rpm-5.4/SNAPSHOT/rpm-5.4.16-0.20160420.src.rpm
Unless I screwed something at the last minute, this SRPM will be released as
rpm-5.4.16
later this week.
Since the last snapshot, there are several i
On 21.03.2016 16:32, Jeff Johnson wrote:
(aside)
I've added Reply-To: which is likely the better forum,
and because I did not receive this msg for whatever reason:
rpm-5.4.16 snapshot, take 2
i wish it would be possible to disable building cruft that is not used.
that is tests (as
(aside)
I've added Reply-To: which is likely the better forum,
and because I did not receive this msg for whatever reason:
rpm-5.4.16 snapshot, take 2
> i wish it would be possible to disable building cruft that is not used.
> that is tests (as we do not run tests) and som
On 16.03.2016 18:28, Jeff Johnson wrote:
There is a recent API change in libtomcrypt (like last few months)
ah, tomcrypt,
i think will switch to previous method in pld for now for maximum
compatibility,
release manager (baggins) decides if pld follows different defaults.
--
glen
__
On Mar 16, 2016, at 12:46 PM, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> On 16.03.2016 18:28, Jeff Johnson wrote:
>> There is a recent API change in libtomcrypt (like last few months)
>
> ah, tomcrypt,
>
> i think will switch to previous method in pld for now for maximum
> compatibility,
> release manager (baggin
On Mar 16, 2016, at 12:12 PM, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> On 15.03.2016 22:27, Jeff Johnson wrote:
>> There is a snapshot release of rpm-5.4.16 now available at
>>
>>
>> http://rpm5.org/files/rpm/rpm-5.4/SNAPSHOT/rpm-5.4.16-0.20160315.src.rpm
>
> have not yet researched from what this error
On Mar 16, 2016, at 1:09 PM, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> On 15.03.2016 22:27, Jeff Johnson wrote:
>> 3) (recommended) rpm-5.4.16 uses db-6.1.23 (not 6.1.26) with
>> DB_MULTIVERSION and DB_TXN_SNAPSHOT.
>> DB_TXN_SNAPSHOT avoids deadlocks with copy-on-write rather than
>>
I have uploaded another snapshot release that addresses
all the issues you have reported:
rpm-5.4.16-0.20160318.src.rpm
The issue of garbled text is both locale and rpm version dependent
and is _NOT_ reproducible with rpm-5.4.16, but is reproducible
with rpm-4.13.0 when a locale is specif
On 15.03.2016 22:27, Jeff Johnson wrote:
There is a snapshot release of rpm-5.4.16 now available at
http://rpm5.org/files/rpm/rpm-5.4/SNAPSHOT/rpm-5.4.16-0.20160315.src.rpm
some rpmio/* tools link errors. hack-fixed by adding -lssl -lacl to
RPMIO_LDADD_COMMON
libtool: link: x86_6
On 18.03.2016 09:49, Jeff Johnson wrote:
I have uploaded another snapshot release that addresses
all the issues you have reported:
rpm-5.4.16-0.20160318.src.rpm
yet another linking error:
/bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link ccache gcc -fopenmp -O2
-fwrapv -pipe -Wformat -Werro
On Mar 16, 2016, at 3:20 PM, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> On 15.03.2016 22:27, Jeff Johnson wrote:
>> There is a snapshot release of rpm-5.4.16 now available at
>>
>>
>> http://rpm5.org/files/rpm/rpm-5.4/SNAPSHOT/rpm-5.4.16-0.20160315.src.rpm
>
> some rpmio/* tools link errors. hack-fixed by
On 15.03.2016 22:27, Jeff Johnson wrote:
3) (recommended) rpm-5.4.16 uses db-6.1.23 (not 6.1.26) with
DB_MULTIVERSION and DB_TXN_SNAPSHOT.
DB_TXN_SNAPSHOT avoids deadlocks with copy-on-write rather than
locking semantics.
so, if i use db-5.2, these chan
On 15.03.2016 22:27, Jeff Johnson wrote:
There is a snapshot release of rpm-5.4.16 now available at
http://rpm5.org/files/rpm/rpm-5.4/SNAPSHOT/rpm-5.4.16-0.20160315.src.rpm
have not yet researched from what this error comes, maybe quicklier just
to ask:
libtool: compile: ccache
raries instead.
Pleas note that my maximally configured development version of rpm looks like
this:
$ ldd .libs/rpm | wc -l
102
(Yes that is rpm linking 102 libraries so I include essential components
internally)
The only lossage will be with LUA: the RPM+LUA embedding will lack some use
On 15.03.2016 22:27, Jeff Johnson wrote:
There is a snapshot release of rpm-5.4.16 now available at
http://rpm5.org/files/rpm/rpm-5.4/SNAPSHOT/rpm-5.4.16-0.20160315.src.rpm
it's text fields seem to contain garbage:
[~/rpm/packages/rpm(5.4.15) (dev-5.4.16)⚡] ➔ less
rpm-5.4.16-0.20160
There is a snapshot release of rpm-5.4.16 now available at
http://rpm5.org/files/rpm/rpm-5.4/SNAPSHOT/rpm-5.4.16-0.20160315.src.rpm
This is the first SRPM built by itself that is headed for release
in the next few weeks that is being provided as a public reference
point for integration an
30 matches
Mail list logo
