On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 14:07:36 +0200, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote:
If we talk about changelog info in a .spec file it is useful while working
without CVS access (eg. server offline) - to have information about changes
as complete as possible.
Agreed.
If we talk about changelog in the rpm
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 18:54:23 +0200, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote:
So, if we are talking about personal preferences, I prefer no changelog at
all than a changelog without the information about the most important
changes.
Truncated changelog has important information: which release we have
On Wed, 3 May 2006, Tomasz Pala wrote:
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 18:54:23 +0200, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote:
So, if we are talking about personal preferences, I prefer no changelog at
all than a changelog without the information about the most important
changes.
Truncated changelog
On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 20:05 +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
On Thursday 27 April 2006 15:04, wrobell wrote:
On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 14:03 +0200, Marcin Król wrote:
how this all relates to subversion repository and claims that
you always need complete changelog?
But we don't build any
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 10:20:36PM +0200, Marcin Król wrote:
in binary rpm's. why pointless?
Few KB more or less per rpm makes no difference for me.
[14:51 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~]% rpm -qa|wc -l
1423
Assuming every package has 10 KB worth of changelog, then we're talking
about 14 MB of almost
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 03:42:30PM +0200, Marcin Król wrote:
[14:51 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~]% rpm -qa|wc -l
1423
So? As I said, that makes no difference _for me_
So? I said it makes difference _for me_.
wolf
--
Bartek . - O! Jest ten co wypisuje o mnie bzdury.
Taudul :
So? I said it makes difference _for me_.
Please read between lines...
It makes no difference for me == I don't care == (you may completly
remove changelogs from rpms || you may keep 10MB changelog in each rpm)
EOT
M.
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
Bartosz Taudul wrote:
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 03:42:30PM +0200, Marcin Król wrote:
[14:51 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~]% rpm -qa|wc -l
1423
So? As I said, that makes no difference _for me_
So? I said it makes difference _for me_.
So, if we are talking about personal preferences, I prefer no
On Wed, 26 Apr 2006, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
hi
i made patch to truncate changelog at build time [1].
the question is how many entries to limit the truncation, and should the
truncation setting be different for Ac and Th?
At least 3 months worth, preferably half a year.
You can't just cut it
On Thursday 27 April 2006 11:15, Jan Rekorajski wrote:
On Wed, 26 Apr 2006, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
hi
i made patch to truncate changelog at build time [1].
the question is how many entries to limit the truncation, and should the
truncation setting be different for Ac and Th?
At least 3
On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 13:07 +0200, Marcin Król wrote:
and if you want complete changelog, you can always use cvsweb.
or cvs log at commandline :)
how this all relates to subversion repository and claims that
you always need complete changelog?
wrobell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
how this all relates to subversion repository and claims that
you always need complete changelog?
But we don't build any rpms from subversion?
M.
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 14:03 +0200, Marcin Król wrote:
how this all relates to subversion repository and claims that
you always need complete changelog?
But we don't build any rpms from subversion?
but while we were discussing migration to svn it was stated
that we really need complete
but while we were discussing migration to svn it was stated
that we really need complete changelog. always.
Wait a second. I got lost. Glen wants to cut changelog in CVS/SVN or in
packages at build time? If in specs, then some of them have already been
cut manually. If in rpms, isn't it
On Thursday 27 April 2006 15:37, Marcin Król wrote:
but while we were discussing migration to svn it was stated
that we really need complete changelog. always.
Wait a second. I got lost. glen wants to cut changelog in CVS/SVN or in
packages at build time? If in specs, then some of them have
On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 19:52 +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
On Thursday 27 April 2006 19:29, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
On Thursday 27 April 2006 15:37, Marcin Król wrote:
but while we were discussing migration to svn it was stated
that we really need complete changelog. always.
Wait a
On Thursday 27 April 2006 15:04, wrobell wrote:
On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 14:03 +0200, Marcin Król wrote:
how this all relates to subversion repository and claims that
you always need complete changelog?
But we don't build any rpms from subversion?
but while we were discussing migration
On Thursday 27 April 2006 19:29, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
On Thursday 27 April 2006 15:37, Marcin Król wrote:
but while we were discussing migration to svn it was stated
that we really need complete changelog. always.
Wait a second. I got lost. glen wants to cut changelog in CVS/SVN or in
in binary rpm's. why pointless?
Few KB more or less per rpm makes no difference for me.
changelog isn't compressed, and some small packages have more in changelog in
Small packages usually doesn't have big changelogs. Of course there are
exceptions.
truncating specfile changelog just to
oh, and this one too. if the changelog is complete, the filelist is 30 pages
far away, comparing to on next page
I'm using mc if I must browse rpm contents :)
M.
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
hi
i made patch to truncate changelog at build time [1].
the question is how many entries to limit the truncation, and should the
truncation setting be different for Ac and Th?
and what macro name to use, currently it's %_buildchangelog
[1]
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 10:47:07PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
i made patch to truncate changelog at build time [1].
the question is how many entries to limit the truncation, and should the
truncation setting be different for Ac and Th?
I guess 15-20 entries should be sufficient for both
--
22 matches
Mail list logo
