Re: rpm suggest backport?

2007-06-14 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
On Thursday 14 June 2007, Jeff Johnson wrote: > Here's most of what you need (I believe, untested): > >     http://wraptastic.org/pub/jbj/rpm-4.4.2-suggests.patch rpm works, poldek works thx :) -- glen ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.

Re: rpm suggest backport?

2007-06-14 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
On Friday 15 June 2007, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > On Thursday 14 June 2007, Jeff Johnson wrote: > > (aside) > > I don't mind at all generating rpm patches. > > then it's not much to ask for patch that ignores uname() deps :) ok. nevermind. it's already there ;) http://cvs.pld-linux.org/SOURCES/rp

Re: rpm suggest backport?

2007-06-14 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
On Thursday 14 June 2007, Jeff Johnson wrote: > (aside) > I don't mind at all generating rpm patches. then it's not much to ask for patch that ignores uname() deps :) this would allow use package manager to upgrade PLD Ac -> PLD Th! > What is hard for me is getting vendorized rpm to build on the

Re: rpm suggest backport?

2007-06-14 Thread Jeff Johnson
On Jun 13, 2007, at 2:47 PM, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > On Wednesday 13 June 2007 21:34:34 Jeff Johnson wrote: >> Send a URI to a relevant rpm-*.src.rpm, please, and I'll send you >> the patch to parse and ignore the new-fangled Suggests: syntax. > > here: ftp://ftp.pld-linux.org/dists/ac/PLD/SRPMS/

Re: rpm suggest backport?

2007-06-13 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
On Wednesday 13 June 2007 21:34:34 Jeff Johnson wrote: > Send a URI to a relevant rpm-*.src.rpm, please, and I'll send you > the patch to parse and ignore the new-fangled Suggests: syntax. here: ftp://ftp.pld-linux.org/dists/ac/PLD/SRPMS/SRPMS/rpm-4.4.2-41.src.rpm thanks ahead :) -- glen __

Re: rpm suggest backport?

2007-06-13 Thread Jeff Johnson
On Jun 13, 2007, at 2:29 PM, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > On Wednesday 13 June 2007 21:16:28 Jeff Johnson wrote: >> Build failure with changed syntax are a different problem. Point >> me at whatever you are calling rpmbuild, and I will send >> you a teensy patch to parse and ignore the new-fangled Sugg

Re: rpm suggest backport?

2007-06-13 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
On Wednesday 13 June 2007 21:16:28 Jeff Johnson wrote: > Build failure with changed syntax are a different problem. Point > me at whatever you are calling rpmbuild, and I will send > you a teensy patch to parse and ignore the new-fangled Suggests: > syntax. That's likely the most expedient hack, bu

Re: rpm suggest backport?

2007-06-13 Thread Jeff Johnson
On Jun 13, 2007, at 1:18 PM, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > can someone with enough rpm hackery mana backport or make rpm > ignore Suggests? > it would ease Th/Ac parallel developement. > > $ ./builder -g spamassassin > P spamassassin.spec > # $Revision: 1.127 $, $Date: 2007/05/11 16:48:16 $ > error: l

rpm suggest backport?

2007-06-13 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
can someone with enough rpm hackery mana backport or make rpm ignore Suggests? it would ease Th/Ac parallel developement. $ ./builder -g spamassassin P spamassassin.spec # $Revision: 1.127 $, $Date: 2007/05/11 16:48:16 $ error: line 61: Unknown tag: Suggests: spamassassin-update Error: package bu