Re: rpm.macros broken

2005-05-19 Thread Fryderyk Dziarmagowski
On Thu, 19 May 2005 12:24:40 +0300 "Elan Ruusamäe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > > > ah, why didn't you say in first place that you;'re using > > > rpm.macros from HEAD? it's broken in HEAD but ok in AC-branch > > > > look at very first sentence in first post ;) > ok, looks like qboosh fixed

Re: rpm.macros broken

2005-05-19 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
On Thursday 19 May 2005 12:11, Fryderyk Dziarmagowski wrote: > On Thu, 19 May 2005 12:02:36 +0300 > "Elan Ruusamäe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [...] > > > ah, why didn't you say in first place that you;'re using rpm.macros > > from HEAD? it's broken in HEAD but ok in AC-branch > > look at very

Re: rpm.macros broken

2005-05-19 Thread Fryderyk Dziarmagowski
On Thu, 19 May 2005 12:02:36 +0300 "Elan Ruusamäe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > ah, why didn't you say in first place that you;'re using rpm.macros > from HEAD? it's broken in HEAD but ok in AC-branch look at very first sentence in first post ;) -- Fryderyk Dziarmagowski

Re: rpm.macros broken

2005-05-19 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
On Thursday 19 May 2005 11:57, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > On Thursday 19 May 2005 11:53, Fryderyk Dziarmagowski wrote: > > On Thu, 19 May 2005 11:39:45 +0300 > > > > "Elan Ruusamäe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thursday 19 May 2005 11:25, Fryderyk Dziarmagowski wrote: > > > > really? it's propab

Re: rpm.macros broken

2005-05-19 Thread Jakub Bogusz
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 11:57:31AM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > On Thursday 19 May 2005 11:53, Fryderyk Dziarmagowski wrote: > > On Thu, 19 May 2005 11:39:45 +0300 > > "Elan Ruusamäe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > > > but it's resolved as replied paladine? > > > > nope. > > i just now looked

Re: rpm.macros broken

2005-05-19 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
On Thursday 19 May 2005 11:53, Fryderyk Dziarmagowski wrote: > On Thu, 19 May 2005 11:39:45 +0300 > > "Elan Ruusamäe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thursday 19 May 2005 11:25, Fryderyk Dziarmagowski wrote: > > > really? it's propably hard to test it without /usr/bin/update- > > > desktop- datab

Re: rpm.macros broken

2005-05-19 Thread Jakub Bogusz
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 10:25:22AM +0200, Fryderyk Dziarmagowski wrote: > On Thu, 19 May 2005 11:12:03 +0300 > Elan Ruusamäe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > > > just uninstall any package containing this macro, builded with rpm > > > after your changes and you can see whats going on. > > show me

Re: rpm.macros broken

2005-05-19 Thread Fryderyk Dziarmagowski
On Thu, 19 May 2005 11:39:45 +0300 "Elan Ruusamäe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thursday 19 May 2005 11:25, Fryderyk Dziarmagowski wrote: > > really? it's propably hard to test it without /usr/bin/update- > > desktop- database (?) > not really much, cp /bin/date /usr/bin/update-desktop-database

Re: rpm.macros broken

2005-05-19 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
On Thursday 19 May 2005 11:25, Fryderyk Dziarmagowski wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] RPMS]$ rpm -qp glabels-2.0.2-3.i686.rpm --scripts output works here. $ rpm -qpi /tmp/glabels-2.0.2-3.i686.rpm Name: glabels Relocations: (not relocatable) Version : 2.0.2

Re: rpm.macros broken

2005-05-19 Thread Fryderyk Dziarmagowski
On Thu, 19 May 2005 10:28:46 +0200 Kamil Kosiński <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > just uninstall any package containing this macro, builded with rpm > > > after your changes and you can see whats going on. > > show me the exact package! > > rpm -qp package.rpm --scripts output > > > > tested her

Re: rpm.macros broken

2005-05-19 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
On Thursday 19 May 2005 11:25, Fryderyk Dziarmagowski wrote: > really? it's propably hard to test it without /usr/bin/update-desktop- > database (?) not really much, cp /bin/date /usr/bin/update-desktop-database :) but it's resolved as replied paladine? glen _

Re: rpm.macros broken

2005-05-19 Thread Kamil Kosiński
Dnia 19-05-2005, czw o godzinie 11:12 +0300, Elan Ruusamäe napisał(a): > > just uninstall any package containing this macro, builded with rpm > > after your changes and you can see whats going on. > show me the exact package! > rpm -qp package.rpm --scripts output > > tested here and worked! False

Re: rpm.macros broken

2005-05-19 Thread Fryderyk Dziarmagowski
On Thu, 19 May 2005 11:12:03 +0300 Elan Ruusamäe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > after rev. 1.210 %update_desktop_database_postun fails on > > > > uninstalling with syntax error: `then' unexpected. > > > > > > > > rev. 1.210 is a c&p from AC-branch: > > > > > > > > rev.1.158.4.36 > > > > - chan

Re: rpm.macros broken

2005-05-19 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
On Thursday 19 May 2005 10:15, Fryderyk Dziarmagowski wrote: > On Thu, 19 May 2005 04:14:29 +0300 > > Elan Ruusamäe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > after rev. 1.210 %update_desktop_database_postun fails on > > > uninstalling with syntax error: `then' unexpected. > > > > > > rev. 1.210 is a c&p fro

Re: rpm.macros broken

2005-05-19 Thread Fryderyk Dziarmagowski
On Thu, 19 May 2005 04:14:29 +0300 Elan Ruusamäe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > after rev. 1.210 %update_desktop_database_postun fails on > > uninstalling with syntax error: `then' unexpected. > > > > rev. 1.210 is a c&p from AC-branch: > > > > rev.1.158.4.36 > > - change -%update_desktop_database

Re: rpm.macros broken

2005-05-18 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
On Wednesday 18 May 2005 23:46, Fryderyk Dziarmagowski wrote: > after rev. 1.210 %update_desktop_database_postun fails on uninstalling > with syntax error: `then' unexpected. > > rev. 1.210 is a c&p from AC-branch: > > rev.1.158.4.36 > - change -%update_desktop_database_* macros so it would be sing

Re: rpm.macros broken

2005-05-18 Thread Fryderyk Dziarmagowski
On Wed, 18 May 2005 22:46:47 +0200 Fryderyk Dziarmagowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > after rev. 1.210 %update_desktop_database_postun fails on uninstalling > with syntax error: `then' unexpected. > > rev. 1.210 is a c&p from AC-branch: > > rev.1.158.4.36 > - change -%update_desktop_database_*

rpm.macros broken

2005-05-18 Thread Fryderyk Dziarmagowski
after rev. 1.210 %update_desktop_database_postun fails on uninstalling with syntax error: `then' unexpected. rev. 1.210 is a c&p from AC-branch: rev.1.158.4.36 - change -%update_desktop_database_* macros so it would be single line in shell context very nice... could someone take a look? :] -