On Oct 22, 2012, at 9:56 AM, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Oct 2012, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
>
>>
>> On Oct 22, 2012, at 6:44 AM, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Rebuilding ~8500 packages is not an option, unfortunately :(
>>>
>>
>> Um … you managed to *build* ~8500 packages using a b
On Mon, 22 Oct 2012, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
>
> On Oct 22, 2012, at 6:44 AM, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
>
> >
> > Rebuilding ~8500 packages is not an option, unfortunately :(
> >
>
> Um … you managed to *build* ~8500 packages using a buggy
> rpmbuild in rpm-5.4.10.
>
> What makes *rebuilding* har
On Oct 22, 2012, at 6:44 AM, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
>
> Rebuilding ~8500 packages is not an option, unfortunately :(
>
Um … you managed to *build* ~8500 packages using a buggy
rpmbuild in rpm-5.4.10.
What makes *rebuilding* harder than building?
Note that not all 8500 packages are affected (o
Jan Rękorajski wrote:
> Quick question, does passing '--nohmacs' option give the same effect as
> your patch to lib/verify.c? In that case we could just make it default
> and add '--hmacs' option.
No. --nohmacs option disables checking hmac entirely even for truly
modified files (with hmac verify
On Sun, 21 Oct 2012, Adam Osuchowski wrote:
> Jan Rękorajski wrote:
> > I'm afraid your patch doesn't work for me, I'm still getting bad md5
> > for config files:
> >
> > $ rpm -V wget
> > ..5. c /etc/wgetrc
> >
> > Am I missing something?
>
> Ok, I made investigation one more time and pro
On Oct 21, 2012, at 2:12 PM, Adam Osuchowski wrote:
>
> IMHO, first method is more elegant but is more difficult and it's not
> worth it.
Ripping out functionality is hardly less difficult.
Yes: you need to rebuild packages affected with rpmbuild +PATCH.
The symptom -- -Va false positives for
Jan Rękorajski wrote:
> I'm afraid your patch doesn't work for me, I'm still getting bad md5
> for config files:
>
> $ rpm -V wget
> ..5. c /etc/wgetrc
>
> Am I missing something?
Ok, I made investigation one more time and probably know what happened.
The patch I sent is against build/file
Jan Rękorajski wrote:
> I'm afraid your patch doesn't work for me, I'm still getting bad md5
> for config files:
>
> $ rpm -V wget
> ..5. c /etc/wgetrc
>
> Am I missing something?
Hmmm, I don't know. Maybe I changed something else during debugging and
forgot about it. Give me some time, I w
On Tue, 16 Oct 2012, Adam Osuchowski wrote:
> Jan Rękorajski wrote:
> > Adam, which bug is fixed by your 1-liner?
>
> The original one: rpm shows bad md5 digest of files marked as
> `%verify(no md5)' (config files) although they are not modified.
I'm afraid your patch doesn't work for me, I'm st
On Oct 16, 2012, at 2:37 AM, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
>
> The confusion here is because Adam found a second bug during duscussion
> here, so it happened to be two reports mixed, the one above
> and the '--nofdigests' option breakage - if you add this
> option then rpm5 reports _all_ files as havin
On Oct 16, 2012, at 2:57 AM, Adam Osuchowski wrote:
>
> FYI, I don't claim that my 1-liner is the best solution for first case.
> I only find it helps. Maybe there is more suitable one.
Actually your 1-liner deletion *is* the best patch.
(aside)
I dimly remember having to debug this issue. Be
Jan Rękorajski wrote:
> Adam, which bug is fixed by your 1-liner?
The original one: rpm shows bad md5 digest of files marked as
`%verify(no md5)' (config files) although they are not modified.
Second case (--nomd5 shows that all files are modified) was only
a proof that there may be a general bug
On Oct 16, 2012, at 2:37 AM, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
>
> Adam, which bug is fixed by your 1-liner?
>
Eeek! I missed the patch. Apologies for being obnoxious:
I haven't heard a bug report on this code in years (but PLD is always first to
find my RPM flaws ;-).
H … here is cvs annotate:
1.
On Tue, 16 Oct 2012, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
>
> On Oct 16, 2012, at 2:14 AM, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
>
> > As simple as possible:
> >
> > $ rpm -V wget
> > ..5. c /etc/wgetrc
> >
> > - rpm reports /etc/wgetrc on disk has different digest than in package
> >
> > md5 of /etc/wgetrc in packa
On Oct 16, 2012, at 2:14 AM, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
> As simple as possible:
>
> $ rpm -V wget
> ..5. c /etc/wgetrc
>
> - rpm reports /etc/wgetrc on disk has different digest than in package
>
> md5 of /etc/wgetrc in package:
>
> $ rpm -qf --qf '%{FILEDIGESTS}\n' /etc/wgetrc
> 0dbf720f5c
As simple as possible:
$ rpm -V wget
..5. c /etc/wgetrc
- rpm reports /etc/wgetrc on disk has different digest than in package
md5 of /etc/wgetrc in package:
$ rpm -qf --qf '%{FILEDIGESTS}\n' /etc/wgetrc
0dbf720f5c9d29cbad8356f758a6a889
md5 of /etc/wgetrc on disk:
$ md5sum /etc/wgetrc
0d
On Oct 15, 2012, at 6:47 PM, Adam Osuchowski wrote:
> Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
>> FYI: the --nomd5 option changed to --nofdigests like 4-5y ago.
>> If there is still "legacy compatibility" for --nomd5, then its time
>> to rip it out imho: I see no reason to maintain myriad
>> confusing alternative
Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
> FYI: the --nomd5 option changed to --nofdigests like 4-5y ago.
> If there is still "legacy compatibility" for --nomd5, then its time
> to rip it out imho: I see no reason to maintain myriad
> confusing alternative invocations for changes made years ago.
What's the differen
On Oct 14, 2012, at 3:28 PM, Adam Osuchowski wrote:
> Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
>> The comparison is against the file on disk (and includes check of mtime)
>> md5sum /etc/wgetrc
>> (or whatever digest you are using: the '5' is mostly hysterical these days)
>
> Ok, I know that comparison is ag
Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
> The comparison is against the file on disk (and includes check of mtime)
> md5sum /etc/wgetrc
> (or whatever digest you are using: the '5' is mostly hysterical these days)
Ok, I know that comparison is against the file on disk but that's what
it's all about. Why rpm
On Oct 14, 2012, at 2:51 PM, Adam Osuchowski wrote:
> Package verification by rpm-5.4.10-18 always shows config files as modified
> (md5sum changed) even though they are not modified.
>
> For example:
>
> root@pld:~# rpm -q --qf '[%{filemd5s} %{filenames}\n]' systemd-units | grep
> /etc/syste
Package verification by rpm-5.4.10-18 always shows config files as modified
(md5sum changed) even though they are not modified.
For example:
root@pld:~# rpm -q --qf '[%{filemd5s} %{filenames}\n]' systemd-units | grep
/etc/systemd/system-preset/default.preset ; md5sum
/etc/systemd/system-preset
22 matches
Mail list logo
