On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 17:30:19 +0200, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> what if i don't want systemd, i want legacy sysvinit/rc-scripts
>
> otherwise it would simply mean i have to pick between broken systems or
> no pld upgrades over 1year
You have several choices:
- do not install systemd at all, keep
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 19:16:49 +0200, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
>> Just do not install the 'systemd' package and keep using SysVinit and
>> rc-scripts. I see no reason to get rid of those, but please keep in mind
>> that the more people switch to systemd the less supported
>> SysVinit/rc-scripts will
On 27.01.2012 18:24, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 05:30:19PM +0200, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
On 27.01.2012 15:26, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
Questions? Comments?
what if i don't want systemd, i want legacy sysvinit/rc-scripts
Just do not install the 'systemd' package and keep using S
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 05:30:19PM +0200, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> On 27.01.2012 15:26, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
> > Questions? Comments?
> what if i don't want systemd, i want legacy sysvinit/rc-scripts
Just do not install the 'systemd' package and keep using SysVinit and
rc-scripts. I see no reason t
On 27 Jan 2012 15:30, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
On 27.01.2012 15:26, Jan R�korajski wrote:
> > Questions? Comments?
> what if i don't want systemd, i want legacy sysvinit/rc-scripts
imho, systemd decision is similar to choosing xorg over old xfree86,
texlive over tetex, udev over devf
On 27.01.2012 15:26, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
Questions? Comments?
what if i don't want systemd, i want legacy sysvinit/rc-scripts
otherwise it would simply mean i have to pick between broken systems or
no pld upgrades over 1year
--
glen
___
pld-deve
en:
Short summary of systemd discussion, what we should do IMO:
- systemd units will go into main package (no more superfluous -systemd rpms)
- packages providing systemd units will have R:systemd-units
- packages providing systemd units will have a trigger migrating (by enabling
new systemd ser
