On Sunday 25 February 2007, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote:
> Tomasz Pala wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 01:31:01PM +0100, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> > > update:
> > > au BufReadPre *.spec setlocal encoding=utf-8
> > > fencs=utf-8,iso-8859-2,latin1 au BufNewFile *.spec setlocal
> > > encoding=utf-8 fe
Tomasz Pala wrote:
>
> On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 01:31:01PM +0100, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> >
> > update:
> > au BufReadPre *.spec setlocal encoding=utf-8 fencs=utf-8,iso-8859-2,latin1
> > au BufNewFile *.spec setlocal encoding=utf-8 fenc=utf-8
>
> All the specs where converted? If so, that's ok for
> Is this not working for someone else than Hawk with Ac RPM? I can't
> reproduce :(
It looks like its my setup. I've done clean Ac install and it works.
Unfortunatelly I can't locate where the problem is. I wasn't changing anything
on non-working systems that may affect charset/locale stuff. Pro
Dnia 18-02-2007, nie o godzinie 16:29 +0100, Marcin Król napisał(a):
> AC-branch remains non UTF until rpm will handle UTF specs properly at
> least on en_US and all pl_PL locales.
It is supposed to handle them properly. What doesn't work?
The behavior as follows: convert the description etc. fr
On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 01:31:54PM +0100, Cezary Krzyzanowski wrote:
> Dnia 18-02-2007, nie o godzinie 13:17 +0100, Tomasz Pala napisał(a):
> > Means what? I don't see vim here. As default `encoding` (internal
> > setting for buffers etc) is latin1 (as I don't use gvim for anything but
> > LaTeX an
On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 12:50:25PM +0100, Tomasz Pala wrote:
> > set fileencoding=iso8859-2
>
> > set fileencodings=ucs-bom,utf-8,iso-8859-2,latin1
>
> And how should it work? Because it does not.
New-enough VIM is needed (older version had big problems with
"fileencoding" sett
On Sunday 18 February 2007, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> On Sunday 18 of February 2007, Marcin Król wrote:
> > > what about AC-branch, RA-branch and other branches that weren't
> > > converted to utf?
> >
> > AC-branch remains non UTF until rpm will handle UTF specs properly at
> > least on en_US
On Sunday 18 of February 2007, Marcin Król wrote:
> > what about AC-branch, RA-branch and other branches that weren't
> > converted to utf?
>
> AC-branch remains non UTF until rpm will handle UTF specs properly at
> least on en_US and all pl_PL locales.
Is this not working for someone else than Ha
> what about AC-branch, RA-branch and other branches that weren't
> converted to utf?
AC-branch remains non UTF until rpm will handle UTF specs properly at
least on en_US and all pl_PL locales.
M.
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-lin
On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 04:15:12PM +0100, Andrzej 'The Undefined' Dopierała
wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 01:31:01PM +0100, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> > > au BufReadPre *.spec setlocal fencs=utf-8,iso-8859-2,latin1
> > > au BufNewFile *.spec setlocal fenc=utf-8
> >
> > update:
> > au BufReadPre *.s
On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 01:31:01PM +0100, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> > au BufReadPre *.spec setlocal fencs=utf-8,iso-8859-2,latin1
> > au BufNewFile *.spec setlocal fenc=utf-8
>
> update:
> au BufReadPre *.spec setlocal encoding=utf-8 fencs=utf-8,iso-8859-2,latin1
> au BufNewFile *.spec setlocal encodi
On Sunday 18 February 2007, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> update:
> au BufReadPre *.spec setlocal encoding=utf-8 fencs=utf-8,iso-8859-2,latin1
> au BufNewFile *.spec setlocal encoding=utf-8 fenc=utf-8
>
> (needed if default encoding is latin* and spec contains non-latin chars)
i'd add there also:
ts=4 sw
On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 01:31:01PM +0100, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
>
> update:
> au BufReadPre *.spec setlocal encoding=utf-8 fencs=utf-8,iso-8859-2,latin1
> au BufNewFile *.spec setlocal encoding=utf-8 fenc=utf-8
All the specs where converted? If so, that's ok for me.
--
Tom Pala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 01:31:54PM +0100, Cezary Krzyzanowski wrote:
>
> So how should this work?
One needs to set encoding to utf-8 (not fileencoding*). Either by
vim-line in specs (like I've suggested) or by hand or eventually
(semi)global (e.g. like qboosh wrote).
--
Tom Pala <[EMAIL PROTECT
Dnia 18-02-2007, nie o godzinie 13:17 +0100, Tomasz Pala napisał(a):
> Means what? I don't see vim here. As default `encoding` (internal
> setting for buffers etc) is latin1 (as I don't use gvim for anything but
> LaTeX and don't have unicode locale) it simply won't work.
So how should this work?
On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 01:18:29PM +0100, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 01:10:36PM +0100, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 12:50:25PM +0100, Tomasz Pala wrote:
> > > On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 12:41:04PM +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> [...]
> > > > put these to .vi
On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 01:10:36PM +0100, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> >
> > And how should it work? Because it does not.
> >
> > Summary(pl.UTF-8): Edytor plikĂłw binarnych oparty na bibliotece
> > ncurses
>
> it needs:
> set encoding=utf-8
> additionaly.
I know that. The other guys don't.
> A
On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 02:08:32PM +0200, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> >
> > And how should it work? Because it does not.
> utf-8 is before iso8859-2:
So? fileencoding!=encoding It's all in the docs.
> > set fileencodings=ucs-bom,utf-8,iso-8859-2,latin1
>
> works here with and without those lines, dun
On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 01:10:36PM +0100, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 12:50:25PM +0100, Tomasz Pala wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 12:41:04PM +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
[...]
> > > put these to .vimrc and no need for meesing with spec files
> > >
> > > set fileencodin
On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 01:04:23PM +0100, Cezary Krzyzanowski wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] bin]$ grep Summary
> \(pl /home/users/czarny/rpm/SPECS/memprof.spec
> Summary(pl.UTF-8): NarzÄdzie do profilowania i detekcji wyciekĂłw
> pamiÄci
Means what? I don't see vim here. As default `encodin
On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 12:50:25PM +0100, Tomasz Pala wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 12:41:04PM +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> > > > # vim:encoding=utf-8
>
> > > >
> > > > line to all the converted specs. Any objections?
> > >
> > > +1
> >
> > -1
> >
> > put these to
On Sunday 18 February 2007, Tomasz Pala wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 12:41:04PM +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> > > > # vim:encoding=utf-8
>
>
>
> > > > line to all the converted specs. Any objections?
> > >
> > > +1
> >
> > -1
> >
> > put these to .vimrc and no need f
Dnia 18-02-2007, nie o godzinie 12:50 +0100, Tomasz Pala napisał(a):
> On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 12:41:04PM +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> > put these to .vimrc and no need for meesing with spec files
> >
> > set fileencoding=iso8859-2
>
> > set fileencodings=ucs-bom,utf-8,i
On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 12:41:04PM +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> > > # vim:encoding=utf-8
> > >
> > > line to all the converted specs. Any objections?
> >
> > +1
>
> -1
>
> put these to .vimrc and no need for meesing with spec files
>
> set fileencoding=iso8859-2
On Sunday 18 of February 2007, Cezary Krzyzanowski wrote:
> Dnia 18-02-2007, nie o godzinie 11:45 +0100, Tomasz Pala napisał(a):
> > I suggest adding:
> >
> > # vim:encoding=utf-8
> >
> > line to all the converted specs. Any objections?
>
> +1
-1
put these to .vimrc and no need for meesing with s
Dnia 18-02-2007, nie o godzinie 11:45 +0100, Tomasz Pala napisał(a):
> I suggest adding:
>
> # vim:encoding=utf-8
>
> line to all the converted specs. Any objections?
>
+1
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.o
I suggest adding:
# vim:encoding=utf-8
line to all the converted specs. Any objections?
--
Tom Pala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://vfmg.sourceforge.net/
http://tccs.sourceforge.net/
___
pld-devel-en maili
27 matches
Mail list logo
