(text copied verbatim into the #913572 as justification)
On Jan 8, 2012, at 6:45 PM, glen wrote:
> On 01/09/2012 01:11 AM, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
>> This is a hard link to a symlink which is pretty obscure functionality.
> nevertheless, it's quite useful when optimizing for packaging speed
> when
On 01/09/2012 01:11 AM, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
This is a hard link to a symlink which is pretty obscure functionality.
nevertheless, it's quite useful when optimizing for packaging speed
when you develop huge packages, you would appreciate faster repackaging
so instead of copying data from %bui
On Jan 8, 2012, at 5:37 PM, glen wrote:
> On 01/09/2012 12:07 AM, glen wrote:
>> i tried to find what is so special in there, %files is just the topdir where
>> all goes in
>
> nailed it!
>
Nice!
> i mean i found symptom that could really explain it.
>
Wuss ;-) You nailed the common ident
On 01/09/2012 12:07 AM, glen wrote:
i tried to find what is so special in there, %files is just the topdir
where all goes in
nailed it!
i mean i found symptom that could really explain it.
http://cvs.pld-linux.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/cvs/packages/test/test.spec?revision=1.16.4.69.2.4.2.1.4.3&
On 01/08/2012 11:55 PM, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
You might also try rearranging lines in the *.spec: there's
lots of screwy issues that occur when a \r or an unclosed
quote/bracket sneak into a *.spec. Without a grammar, there
isn't any simple way to catch the screwiness, its all just
an ad hoc par
On Jan 8, 2012, at 4:40 PM, glen wrote:
> On 01/08/2012 11:32 PM, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
>> OK. If the symlink isn't in the *.rpm pkg, then its easy to understand why
>> the
>> symlink wasn't installed.
>
> it is in a package (as common sense), see rpm -qpl listing in first post!
>
ok. techni
On 01/08/2012 11:32 PM, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
OK. If the symlink isn't in the *.rpm pkg, then its easy to understand why the
symlink wasn't installed.
it is in a package (as common sense), see rpm -qpl listing in first post!
--
glen
___
pld-devel-e
On Jan 8, 2012, at 4:09 PM, glen wrote:
> On 01/08/2012 10:36 PM, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
>>
>> *From: *Jeffrey Johnson mailto:n3...@me.com>>
>> *Subject: **Re: why is my symlink gone*
>> *Date: *January 8, 2012 3:35:57 PM EST
>> *To: *"PLD: Devel
On 01/08/2012 10:36 PM, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
*From: *Jeffrey Johnson mailto:n3...@me.com>>
*Subject: **Re: why is my symlink gone*
*Date: *January 8, 2012 3:35:57 PM EST
*To: *"PLD: Developers list (English)"
<mailto:pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org>>
On Jan
a symlink, in .spec, nothing special in it, %config or plain listing,
visible in rpm -qpl, but not placed to filesystem. dumps below.
wtf is happening!?
tested various systems (thus i find nothing special in them):
ac 4.5, 4.4.9
th 4.5
# rpm -Uhvv fetch-crl-id.ee-1.0-0.2.noarch.rpm
D: =
10 matches
Mail list logo