On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 04:34:52PM +0200, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> On Monday 22 December 2008 20:43:48 wrobell wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 01:17:11PM +0200, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> > > On Monday 22 December 2008 11:22:42 wrobell wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 07:35:54PM +0100, Pawel Gol
On Monday 22 December 2008 20:43:48 wrobell wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 01:17:11PM +0200, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> > On Monday 22 December 2008 11:22:42 wrobell wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 07:35:54PM +0100, Pawel Golaszewski wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 19 Dec 2008, wrobell wrote:
> > > > > a
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 01:17:11PM +0200, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> you can always do cvs annotate and ask whoever added it...
Jokes go to fortunes CVS module, not here.
wolf
--
Bartek .
Taudul :
.:
w o l f @ p
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 01:17:11PM +0200, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> On Monday 22 December 2008 11:22:42 wrobell wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 07:35:54PM +0100, Pawel Golaszewski wrote:
> > > On Fri, 19 Dec 2008, wrobell wrote:
> > > > as i know we have ac branch for ac distro line. what's the poi
On Monday 22 December 2008 11:22:42 wrobell wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 07:35:54PM +0100, Pawel Golaszewski wrote:
> > On Fri, 19 Dec 2008, wrobell wrote:
> > > as i know we have ac branch for ac distro line. what's the point of ac
> > > bcond in xulrunner.spec?
> >
> > I think it's good direc
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 07:35:54PM +0100, Pawel Golaszewski wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Dec 2008, wrobell wrote:
> > as i know we have ac branch for ac distro line. what's the point of ac
> > bcond in xulrunner.spec?
>
> I think it's good direction when the difference is only in BR's or some
> simple co
On Saturday 20 December 2008 16:47, wrobell wrote:
> so just to state it loud. we do allow distro line bconds like "ra", "ac",
> and "ti". there shall be no "th" bconds as it is trunk forever.
there's no bcond. it's %{pld_release} macro rather...
--
glen
_
On Saturday 20 of December 2008, wrobell wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 02:04:39PM +0100, Pawel Golaszewski wrote:
> > On Fri, 19 Dec 2008, wrobell wrote:
> > > > > as i know we have ac branch for ac distro line. what's the point of
> > > > > ac bcond in xulrunner.spec?
> > > >
> > > > I think it
On Sat, 20 Dec 2008, wrobell wrote:
> so just to state it loud. we do allow distro line bconds like "ra",
> "ac", and "ti".
yep.
Just not bconds - conditions.
> there shall be no "th" bconds as it is trunk forever.
Byt default HEAD is for Th. OTher lines can use conditions for simplicity.
--
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 02:04:39PM +0100, Pawel Golaszewski wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Dec 2008, wrobell wrote:
> > > > as i know we have ac branch for ac distro line. what's the point of
> > > > ac bcond in xulrunner.spec?
> > > I think it's good direction when the difference is only in BR's or
> > > s
On Fri, 19 Dec 2008, wrobell wrote:
> > > as i know we have ac branch for ac distro line. what's the point of
> > > ac bcond in xulrunner.spec?
> > I think it's good direction when the difference is only in BR's or
> > some simple configure options. There is no point in branching for so
> > simp
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 07:35:54PM +0100, Pawel Golaszewski wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Dec 2008, wrobell wrote:
> > as i know we have ac branch for ac distro line. what's the point of ac
> > bcond in xulrunner.spec?
>
> I think it's good direction when the difference is only in BR's or some
> simple co
On Fri, 19 Dec 2008, wrobell wrote:
> as i know we have ac branch for ac distro line. what's the point of ac
> bcond in xulrunner.spec?
I think it's good direction when the difference is only in BR's or some
simple configure options. There is no point in branching for so simple
things.
--
poz
as i know we have ac branch for ac distro line. what's the point of ac
bcond in xulrunner.spec?
best regards,
wrobell
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
14 matches
Mail list logo
