On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 20:05 +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
On Thursday 27 April 2006 15:04, wrobell wrote:
On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 14:03 +0200, Marcin Król wrote:
how this all relates to subversion repository and claims that
you always need complete changelog?
But we don't build any
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 10:20:36PM +0200, Marcin Król wrote:
in binary rpm's. why pointless?
Few KB more or less per rpm makes no difference for me.
[14:51 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~]% rpm -qa|wc -l
1423
Assuming every package has 10 KB worth of changelog, then we're talking
about 14 MB of almost
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 03:42:30PM +0200, Marcin Król wrote:
[14:51 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~]% rpm -qa|wc -l
1423
So? As I said, that makes no difference _for me_
So? I said it makes difference _for me_.
wolf
--
Bartek . - O! Jest ten co wypisuje o mnie bzdury.
Taudul :
So? I said it makes difference _for me_.
Please read between lines...
It makes no difference for me == I don't care == (you may completly
remove changelogs from rpms || you may keep 10MB changelog in each rpm)
EOT
M.
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
Bartosz Taudul wrote:
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 03:42:30PM +0200, Marcin Król wrote:
[14:51 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~]% rpm -qa|wc -l
1423
So? As I said, that makes no difference _for me_
So? I said it makes difference _for me_.
So, if we are talking about personal preferences, I prefer no
