On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 02:52:45PM +0200, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote:
IMO 17.II is less misleading. But if you do not agree, talk to glibc-locale
First of all - 17.II with dot between them is grammar mistake.
Hey! I've found we need to change clock too:
Tomasz Pala wrote:
Hey! I've found we need to change clock too:
http://www.zegarkiclub.pl/forum/viewtopic.php?t=8334sid=7cced6260274a9d3f50628115ccc03b2
apparently most common in Poland is 12h system with roman numbers for
hours.
This is definitely wrong list.
--
EN:
Short backstory: between June 18th and June 21st all Ac poldek indexes
for following trees: updates, supported, ready and test were deleted
(instead of being updated) and regenerated from scratch using snapshot
of poldek 0.21. Unfortunately these new indexes were somehow broken
because both
OK. So I finally checked what date format is commonly used in newest printed
sources. It is with roman numbers for months.
References:
Multimedialna Encyklopedia Brittanica (C) 2006
N. Davies Wyspy, translation (C) 2003
This sources are just the first modern books containing dates inside that I
On Sat, Jun 23, 2007 at 08:28:39PM +0200, marcus wrote:
Author: marcus Date: Sat Jun 23 18:28:39 2007 GMT
Module: SOURCES Tag: HEAD
Log message:
- http://download.nvidia.com/XFree86/nforce/1.21/NFORCE-Linux-x86-1.21.zip
++#define RHES3
EN:
Correction. Full indexes of ac-updates for i686 have been recovered.
PL:
Poprawka. Pelne indeksy ac-updates dla i686 zostaly odtworzone.
M.
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org