Dnia 19-09-2007, Śr o godzinie 22:22 +0200, Rafał Cygnarowski
napisał(a):
quotation
If an individual or organization is creating a Community Edition of Mozilla
Firefox or Thunderbird, it must use the names Firefox Community Edition
or Thunderbird Community Edition to identify this software.
I think Debian does allow it, but I don't even remember those package
names. BTW: iceweasel.spec contains obsolete version of package, with
well known security bugs.
Those Debian patches seems to simply replace logos and some texts in
source. After removing debian specific chunks from patches
Dnia czwartek, 20 września 2007, Cezary Krzyzanowski napisał:
Dnia 19-09-2007, Śr o godzinie 22:22 +0200, Rafał Cygnarowski
napisał(a):
quotation
If an individual or organization is creating a Community Edition of
Mozilla Firefox or Thunderbird, it must use the names Firefox Community
Older versions of Firefox used Bon Echo branding which is permitted
to all parties. Now it seems official branding is back. Any particular
reason? Are we allowed to do that? We can use community edition
instead of Bon Echo but I doubt we are allowed to ship it as
Firefox.
--
Patryk Zawadzki
On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 09:42:06PM +0200, Marcin Król wrote:
Older versions of Firefox used Bon Echo branding which is permitted
to all parties. Now it seems official branding is back. Any particular
reason? Are we allowed to do that? We can use community edition
instead of Bon Echo but I
Dnia środa, 19 września 2007, Jakub Bogusz napisał:
Mozilla Community Edition Policy doesn't say anything about files
or filenames, just:
You may not prefix the name product with Mozilla (e.g. Mozilla
Firefox Community Edition is not allowed.) nor use the official Firefox
or Thunderbird
