Fedora 11 has declared they only supply an i686 kernel in PAE mode.
I'd like to propose the same for PLD Th.
Rationale:
* only very old hardware like first Pentium M chips does not support hardware
* 4GB is more and more common on consumer grade machines (heck, my
not-so-now custom made laptop
On Tue, 10 Feb 2009, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
Rationale:
* only very old hardware like first Pentium M chips does not support hardware
3 years is very old? Come on...
I have 2 laptops, both are non-PAE... Only the newest one with C2D on
board is.
Only the Pentium M is problem. Sonoma with
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Patryk Zawadzki pat...@pld-linux.org wrote:
Fedora 11 has declared they only supply an i686 kernel in PAE mode.
I'd like to propose the same for PLD Th.
Rationale:
* only very old hardware like first Pentium M chips does not support hardware
* 4GB is more
2009/2/10 Patryk Zawadzki pat...@pld-linux.org:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Patryk Zawadzki pat...@pld-linux.org wrote:
Fedora 11 has declared they only supply an i686 kernel in PAE mode.
I'd like to propose the same for PLD Th.
Rationale:
* only very old hardware like first Pentium M
On Tue, 10 Feb 2009, Bartosz Świątek wrote:
Fedora 11 has declared they only supply an i686 kernel in PAE mode.
I'd like to propose the same for PLD Th. Rationale:
* only very old hardware like first Pentium M chips does not support
hardware
Sorry, can't follow. Only Pentium M
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 3:37 PM, Bartosz Świątek shad...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/2/10 Patryk Zawadzki pat...@pld-linux.org:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Patryk Zawadzki pat...@pld-linux.org
wrote:
Fedora 11 has declared they only supply an i686 kernel in PAE mode.
I'd like to propose the
W dniu 10 lutego 2009 15:59 użytkownik Patryk Zawadzki
pat...@pld-linux.org napisał:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 3:37 PM, Bartosz Świątek shad...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/2/10 Patryk Zawadzki pat...@pld-linux.org:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Patryk Zawadzki pat...@pld-linux.org
wrote:
Fedora
2009/2/10 Bartosz Świątek shad...@gmail.com:
W dniu 10 lutego 2009 15:59 użytkownik Patryk Zawadzki
pat...@pld-linux.org napisał:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 3:37 PM, Bartosz Świątek shad...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/2/10 Patryk Zawadzki pat...@pld-linux.org:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Patryk
2009/2/10 Bartosz Świątek shad...@gmail.com:
2009/2/10 Bartosz Świątek shad...@gmail.com:
W dniu 10 lutego 2009 15:59 użytkownik Patryk Zawadzki
Again wikipedia:
Physical Address Extension (PAE) is a feature of x86 and x86-64
processors that enable the use of more than 4 gigabytes[1] of
Dnia wtorek, 10 lutego 2009, Łukasz Jernaś napisał:
2009/2/10 Bartosz Świątek shad...@gmail.com:
2009/2/10 Bartosz Świątek shad...@gmail.com:
W dniu 10 lutego 2009 15:59 użytkownik Patryk Zawadzki
Again wikipedia:
Physical Address Extension (PAE) is a feature of x86 and x86-64
* 4GB is more and more common on consumer grade machines (heck, my
not-so-now custom made laptop has 4GB)
Yet with PAE single process still won't be able to allocate more than
~3.2 gigs of RAM. So if someone really want to use more than 4 gigs of
memory x86_64 is way better choice.
* some
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 7:52 PM, Marcin Krol h...@limanowa.net wrote:
* 4GB is more and more common on consumer grade machines (heck, my
not-so-now custom made laptop has 4GB)
Yet with PAE single process still won't be able to allocate more than
~3.2 gigs of RAM. So if someone really want to
2009/2/10 Marcin Krol h...@limanowa.net:
* some x86_64 servers are forced to run in 32-bit mode due to
proprietary software or some other requirements
I'd rather virtualize such systems on x86_64 hosts, but thats just me :)
No need to either.
x86_64 as we just learned have the ability to
Yes, and get to maintain two systems instead of one ;)
Not a problem for me :)
Why not just build pae kernels like I do in Titanium for i686? Does it
have to be kernel instead of kernel-pae?
I'm fine with that if there's at least nvidia module available.
All additional kernel stuff
14 matches
Mail list logo
