Re: [Product-Developers] Product for sports club

2011-06-01 Thread Jean Jordaan
> But a > match is more than an event - it has players, officials, results, etc. And a > match also is part of a tournament for which one needs a summary of results, > log standings, etc. Possibly some of the conference-oriented products may provide a starting point. They're also about highly stru

Re: [Product-Developers] restore IPython's zope profile

2011-08-23 Thread Jean Jordaan
> Does anyone else debug Plone with IPython 0.11? I do sometimes with 0.10 -- jean . .. //\\\oo///\\ ___ Product-Developers mailing list product-develop...@lists.plone.org https://lists.plone.org/mailma

Re: [Product-Developers] plone.app.jquerytools, disabled scripts in js registry, profile deps: stop the madness!

2011-08-26 Thread Jean Jordaan
On 8/26/11, Sean Upton wrote: > This seems an intractable problem for every possible type of add-on > (including site-specific policy products). It effectively means you > have to re-install the js registry profile bits for your specific > product in portal_setup manually after the installation o

Re: [Product-Developers] keeping track on "what's going on", colletive vs github

2011-10-05 Thread Jean Jordaan
> I'm unable to understand how to "Check out: http://collective.github.com/"; > :) Just click on the link. Then you read: "File a ticket that you want permission here: https://github.com/collective/collective.github.com/issues"; And just below that: "Or fork collective.github.com repository, edi

Re: [Product-Developers] pypi vs plone.org releases

2011-10-11 Thread Jean Jordaan
>> For me it is just a matter of configuring your ~/.pypirc file and your >> python correctly and using zest.releaser, as described here: >> http://pypi.python.org/pypi/zest.releaser#prepare-for-pypi-distribution > > yes this works but lots of developers just aren't doing it. Also if you're referr

Re: [Product-Developers] PloneIDE

2011-10-13 Thread Jean Jordaan
> It's an IDE for Plone development. Seriously impressive. It's like Firebug for Plone, all the way down, not just the browser side. The screencast wastes some time, you need patience to get to the good bits. -- jean                                              . .. //\\\oo///\\ ___

Re: [Product-Developers] PloneIDE

2011-10-13 Thread Jean Jordaan
>> Are you coming to Plone conference? > > Mmm... i don't think so... i would like to, but i'm a bit short in cash :P Hey Franco --- I bought a conference ticket but I can't go any more :-( If it's possible to transfer tickets, you can have mine, if that will enable you to go. eleddy, is somethin

Re: [Product-Developers] Github collective feature request, auto add issue tracker

2011-10-17 Thread Jean Jordaan
>> Is there any way to auto add issue tracker on repository on >> github/collective ? Apropos that: https://github.com/blog/959-issues-dashboard-for-organizations "Organizations. Issues dashboard. Together at last. Now you can discover all issues across your organization from a single page!" -

Re: [Product-Developers] Thoughts on merging sauna.reload into plone.reload

2011-10-24 Thread Jean Jordaan
Hi Asko For the reasons you give, I agree that replacing plone.reload with sauna.reload would not be workable. However I think it's unfortunate that the distinguishing part of the name ("plone" vs "sauna") is meaningless. The only thing that you can get out of it is that the "plone" one looks mor

Re: [Product-Developers] Thoughts on merging sauna.reload into plone.reload

2011-10-24 Thread Jean Jordaan
>> plone.reload.addons >> plone.reload.coredev > > -1 for nesting namespaces and replacing renaming plone.reload, which is in > wide use. > How about plone.autoreload or something like that? I still don't grok what the issue with nested namespaces is. To avoid nesting, one could do: plone.reload_

Re: [Product-Developers] What needs to be migrated to github?

2011-11-20 Thread Jean Jordaan
Hi Rok > what you want me to migrate (next weekend). i hope this will be my last > bigger migration and i will be able to slowly retire of my migration duty. Awesome job migrating tons of repos! Last week I wanted to link to a line in Poi, and discovered that Products.Poi is not on github. Is th

Re: [Product-Developers] What needs to be migrated to github?

2011-11-21 Thread Jean Jordaan
Hi Rok & all >> Is there a migration recipe that you could post, so that others can >> continue your work? > > https://github.com/plone/svn-migrate Cool. I've added that as a note to `index.rst`; logged as https://github.com/collective/collective.github.com/pull/71 Can we change the "Website/Blo

Re: [Product-Developers] What needs to be migrated to github?

2011-11-21 Thread Jean Jordaan
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Rok Garbas wrote: >>> syncing is not possible. either you move your stuff to gihub or you leave it >>> on svn/collective (or you move it to any other location bitbucket). >> >> So migrated repos should become read-only on svn.plone.org ... > > i would suggest that

Re: [Product-Developers] How to assign local roles using the website?

2011-12-07 Thread Jean Jordaan
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 9:56 PM, Sean Upton wrote: > I'm always a bit deflated that Plone papered over the distinction > between roles and permissions on the sharing page.  It is a leaky > abstraction. +1 The concepts of roles, groups, members and permissions are very useful. There are subtleties

Re: [Product-Developers] (help!) How to set site root permissions in the web interface?

2011-12-09 Thread Jean Jordaan
> Hi Gilles, thanks for the suggestion. Most pages in the website are related > to a > content type, and I know how to set permissions for these. The site root > however > is not an instance of a content type. One possibility: choose an instance of a content type (e.g. a Page) as the site root.

Re: [Product-Developers] How attached to POI issue trackers are we?

2012-02-09 Thread Jean Jordaan
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Ross Patterson wrote: > But seriously, I'm just addressing the, IMO, erroneous conflation of a > community making smart decisions of where to put its energy with > coercion. This energy is certainly precious. There's different goals involved though. The community

Re: [Product-Developers] How attached to POI issue trackers are we?

2012-02-09 Thread Jean Jordaan
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 1:07 PM, T. Kim Nguyen wrote: > I may be treading on dangerous ground here, but could the Foundation pay > something to give developers incentive or time to work on things like > maintaining plone.org and such? I don't think that would be unreasonable ... it would count as

Re: [Product-Developers] planet.plone.org cleanup - everyone with a blog on Planet Plone needs to read this

2012-02-27 Thread Jean Jordaan
>> also, I think it would be very nice if people writing about other topics >> can update their blog feeds in order to include only Plone-related posts... > > Huh?  It's a site for blogs.  You write about what you think is > relevant - if that's not Plone, so what?  It's one thing to suggest > that

Re: [Product-Developers] [ANN] collective.conference

2012-03-14 Thread Jean Jordaan
> Just announcing that with help of Fedora community volunteers, we're working > on an add-on that provides all the features needed for a conference > including registration, scheduling with multiple track (room) support. Awesome! Is there anything (code, ideas) from the PloneConf sites that can

Re: [Product-Developers] [ANN] New simplified product skeleton for Plone

2012-03-21 Thread Jean Jordaan
Hi all Just to try and keep things straight for myself, I've created an overview of the approaches that I'm aware of: http://jean.github.com/PloneDevelopmentLayouts.html -- jean                                              . .. //\\\oo///\\ ___

Re: [Product-Developers] [ANN] New simplified product skeleton for Plone

2012-03-21 Thread Jean Jordaan
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Dylan Jay wrote: > With collective.hostout they don't even need the step of deploying out of > source control [...] > Instead hostout packages and uploads their development eggs for them > directly into the remote server buildout cache, as well as setting up the >

Re: [Product-Developers] DataGridField

2012-07-17 Thread Jean Jordaan
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 3:00 AM, Nicolas Azevedo wrote: > I'm following this > tutorial(http://plone.org/products/ploneformgen/documentation/tutorial/advanced-sql-crud-with-ploneformgen/tutorial-all-pages) > to learn how to use this product, but when I create the python script > "py_insert_data" h

Re: [Product-Developers] DataGridField

2012-07-19 Thread Jean Jordaan
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 1:26 AM, Nicolas Azevedo wrote: > AttributeError: Request That should probably be REQUEST. -- jean . .. //\\\oo///\\ ___ Product-Developers mailing list product-develop...@lists

Re: [Product-Developers] Taxonomy support in a modern Plone

2012-08-30 Thread Jean Jordaan
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 1:59 PM, Dylan Jay wrote: > > http://plone.org/products/atvocabularymanager/ which has tree like > vocabularies. This uses content types as terms. I'm fond of ATVocabularyManager. I like that vocabularies are content, supporting all the normal stuff like cut'n'paste and sh

Re: [Product-Developers] Taxonomy support in a modern Plone

2012-08-30 Thread Jean Jordaan
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 2:44 AM, Sean Upton wrote: > I have had this notion for a while that there needs to be some kind of > ability -- based on the content context -- to look up (flat and > tree-like) terms (sources) from both user-curated taxonomies (as > content, like ATVM) and from pluggable

Re: [Product-Developers] Plone 4.3 compatibility for plone.org products (was Plone 4.2 compatibility for plone.org products)

2013-01-06 Thread Jean Jordaan
Hi Luca, > Where is the code of the PSC used by plone.org? If you start from https://github.com/plone/Products.PloneOrg you should find it. -- jean . .. //\\\oo///\\ ___ Product-Developers mailing list

Re: [Product-Developers] Non-open source plone plugins?

2013-07-31 Thread Jean Jordaan
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Dylan Jay wrote: > My understand was that you couldn't license a plone product with anything > other than a GPL license due to the Plone GPL license. Does that prevent you > from being to sell a plugin Selling a plugin is fine: "we encourage people who redistribut

Re: [Product-Developers] Non-open source plone plugins?

2013-07-31 Thread Jean Jordaan
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Dylan Jay wrote: > > Just to be clear, we weren't planning on selling a plugin as thats not really > our style, but I did notice a prominent Plone company now seems to be selling > rather than freely distributing some very useful plugins, which is a shame. Any buy