Re: [Product-Developers] conventions on version numbering

2013-11-07 Thread Maurits van Rees
Johannes Raggam schreef op 30-10-13 21:00: On Mit, 2013-10-30 at 12:26 -0700, ajung wrote: "Our" versioning schema refers to Plone? This one, which should become the Plone coding conventions: https://github.com/plone/plone.api/blob/master/docs/contribute/conventions.rst#versioning-scheme I'd

Re: [Product-Developers] conventions on version numbering

2013-11-05 Thread Johannes Raggam
On Mit, 2013-10-30 at 22:16 +0100, Guido Stevens wrote: > Oops correction: 1.2.3dev > 1.2.3rc1 no, 1.2.3.dev < 1.2.3.rc1 < 1.2.3.rcdev I got hit by naming plone.event 1.0dev and depending on >=1.0rc1 I updated the versioning scheme secion in plone.api's convention doc: https://github.com/plone/pl

Re: [Product-Developers] conventions on version numbering

2013-10-31 Thread Christian Ledermann
I can feel your pain and am +1 with you on that my personal experience is that 4.2 to 4.3 is more painful than i expected :( On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Andreas Jung wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Christian Ledermann wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 9:48 A

Re: [Product-Developers] conventions on version numbering

2013-10-31 Thread Andreas Jung
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Christian Ledermann wrote: > On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Andreas Jung > wrote: > > > Christian Ledermann wrote: On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 8:37 AM, Andreas Jung wrote: David Glick (Plone) wrote: >>> On 10/30/13, 12:17 PM, Héctor V

Re: [Product-Developers] conventions on version numbering

2013-10-31 Thread Christian Ledermann
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Andreas Jung wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Christian Ledermann wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 8:37 AM, Andreas Jung >> wrote: David Glick (Plone) wrote: > On 10/30/13, 12:17 PM, Héctor Velarde wrote: >> according to ou

Re: [Product-Developers] conventions on version numbering

2013-10-30 Thread Andreas Jung
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Christian Ledermann wrote: > On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 8:37 AM, Andreas Jung > wrote: David Glick (Plone) wrote: On 10/30/13, 12:17 PM, Héctor Velarde wrote: > according to our versioning scheme conventions, we should do > the following:

Re: [Product-Developers] conventions on version numbering

2013-10-30 Thread Christian Ledermann
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 8:37 AM, Andreas Jung wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > David Glick (Plone) wrote: >> On 10/30/13, 12:17 PM, Héctor Velarde wrote: >>> according to our versioning scheme conventions, we should do the >>> following: >>> >>> Given a version number M

Re: [Product-Developers] conventions on version numbering

2013-10-30 Thread Andreas Jung
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 David Glick (Plone) wrote: > On 10/30/13, 12:17 PM, Héctor Velarde wrote: >> according to our versioning scheme conventions, we should do the >> following: >> >> Given a version number MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH, increment the: >> >> * MAJOR version when you

Re: [Product-Developers] conventions on version numbering

2013-10-30 Thread Guido Stevens
Oops correction: 1.2.3dev > 1.2.3rc1 1.2.3rc1 = 1.2.3.rc1 = 1.2.3-rc1 = 1.2.3.c rc = .rc = -rc = c dev follows c So using .dev as if it were equal or before alpha is faulty. A dev release is between beta and final. -- Guido Stevens | +31.43.3618933 | http://cosent.nl s o c i a l k

Re: [Product-Developers] conventions on version numbering

2013-10-30 Thread Guido Stevens
On 30 okt. 2013, at 21:00, Johannes Raggam wrote: > Regarding versioning schemes: Comparing the versioning scheme section > described in conventions.rst, which I wrote and the scheme described on > http://semver.org/ - there are some differences regarding pre-release > versions. They require p

Re: [Product-Developers] conventions on version numbering

2013-10-30 Thread Johannes Raggam
On Mit, 2013-10-30 at 12:26 -0700, ajung wrote: > "Our" versioning schema refers to Plone? This one, which should become the Plone coding conventions: https://github.com/plone/plone.api/blob/master/docs/contribute/conventions.rst#versioning-scheme I'd do a PATCH increment. But if a package only h

Re: [Product-Developers] conventions on version numbering

2013-10-30 Thread Héctor Velarde
HV> this is the Plone Product Developers, isn't it? http://developer.plone.org/reference_manuals/external/plone.api/contribute/conventions.html#versioning-scheme see what happens when you miss a Plone Conference? Héctor Velarde On 30-10-2013 17:26, ajung wrote: "Our" versioning schema refers

Re: [Product-Developers] conventions on version numbering

2013-10-30 Thread David Glick (Plone)
On 10/30/13, 12:17 PM, Héctor Velarde wrote: according to our versioning scheme conventions, we should do the following: Given a version number MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH, increment the: * MAJOR version when you make incompatible API changes, * MINOR version when you add functionality in a backwards-co

Re: [Product-Developers] conventions on version numbering

2013-10-30 Thread ajung
"Our" versioning schema refers to Plone? -aj hvelarde wrote > according to our versioning scheme conventions, we should do the > following: > > Given a version number MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH, increment the: > > * MAJOR version when you make incompatible API changes, > * MINOR version when you add fu

[Product-Developers] conventions on version numbering

2013-10-30 Thread Héctor Velarde
according to our versioning scheme conventions, we should do the following: Given a version number MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH, increment the: * MAJOR version when you make incompatible API changes, * MINOR version when you add functionality in a backwards-compatible manner, and * PATCH version when you