On 3/21/12 12:58 PM, Sean Upton wrote:
Okay, so I'm just moving my rant from #plone here, but here goes: is
any one else frustrated that we have to define a tinymce.xml just to
get resource (linkable, container) types listed for hyperlinks?
Does it not seem that this could/should be better done
Okay, so I'm just moving my rant from #plone here, but here goes: is
any one else frustrated that we have to define a tinymce.xml just to
get resource (linkable, container) types listed for hyperlinks?
Does it not seem that this could/should be better done on each type's
respective FTI (e.g. a beh
