On 2008-08-05 23:14+0100 Steve Schwartz wrote:
[...] Then it makes, but the install fails
> at:
>
> -- Set runtime path of
> "/home/opt_home/plplot/plplot-5.9.0/install_dir/lib/libplplotf95d.so.9.1.1"
> to "/home/opt_home/plplot/plplot-5.9.0/install_dir/lib:/usr/lib"
> CMake Error at bindings/f95
I have succeeded in building plplot on my Suse 10.2 system (the cmake
rpm of which does not contain the Modules), but only by a hybrid hack of
installing cmake 2.6 (I've tried both 2.6.0 binary and 2.6.1 built from
source on my machine) and using those 2.6 Modules with the
Suse-installed cmake-2.4p
On 2008-08-05 09:59+0100 Andrew Ross wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 02, 2008 at 08:54:07AM -0700, Alan Irwin wrote:
>> On 2008-08-02 10:09+0100 Andrew Ross wrote:
>>
>>> C and f95 versions of example 21 give identical results here for me.
>>> Either this is a 64-bit issue, or it is a difference between diff
On Sat, Aug 02, 2008 at 08:54:07AM -0700, Alan Irwin wrote:
> On 2008-08-02 10:09+0100 Andrew Ross wrote:
>
> >C and f95 versions of example 21 give identical results here for me.
> >Either this is a 64-bit issue, or it is a difference between different
> >versions of gfortran (I'm using 4.2.3). C
Steve,
I agree with you that I don't like the system dependent code in the
examples. I am coming to your conclusion that perhaps plplot ought to
supply come ancillary functions to handle the date conversions, at least
on those systems which don't have a working timegm. For POSIX systems
this coul
