Andrew Ross wrote:
(1) Normally, I believe it should be the user's responsibility to set the
flags appropriate for their compiler.
So what happens if you simply use
FC='ifort -assume byterecl'
?
If that works for all examples without messing them up, then perhaps we
should recommend that
On 2008-08-13 15:19-0600 Orion Poplawski wrote:
> Andrew Ross wrote:
>> In principal I like the idea of being able to see the examples as they
>> are exectuted. I wonder whether the whole command line is necessary
>> though. Perhaps just echoing the example name would suffice and would
>> prevent
On 2008-08-13 22:13+0100 Andrew Ross wrote:
> In principal I like the idea of being able to see the examples as they
> are exectuted. I wonder whether the whole command line is necessary
> though. Perhaps just echoing the example name would suffice and would
> prevent too much unnecessary clutter
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 09:39:41PM -0700, Alan Irwin wrote:
> On 2008-08-11 22:09+0100 Andrew Ross wrote:
>
> >
> > I've been testing the fortran examples using a rather old version of
> > ifort (8.1) on 64-bit linux. In order to get the examples to compile and
> > run I encountered two issues
> >
Andrew Ross wrote:
> In principal I like the idea of being able to see the examples as they
> are exectuted. I wonder whether the whole command line is necessary
> though. Perhaps just echoing the example name would suffice and would
> prevent too much unnecessary clutter in the output? For testing
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 07:48:54PM -0700, Alan Irwin wrote:
> On 2008-08-11 21:39-0700 Alan W. Irwin wrote:
>
> > On 2008-08-11 22:09+0100 Andrew Ross wrote:
> >> For example 21, some of the differences are just rounding errors. I do
> >> however see some additional line at the end like. This is
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 03:45:39PM -0700, Alan Irwin wrote:
> On 2008-08-11 19:59-0700 Alan W. Irwin wrote:
>
> > On 2008-08-11 14:43-0600 Orion Poplawski wrote:
> >
> >> Wishlist: a verbose testing option that
> >> would output the actual command executed for each test.
>
> I have implemented a
