Re: [Plplot-devel] MinGW 4.3.1 fortran 77 troubles

2008-09-07 Thread Arjen Markus
Alan W. Irwin wrote: > > Also, please note that I have been working on gcc visibility issues > recently > so I may have inadvertently messed up the MinGW version of GCC case. The > the PLplot trunk version right now, all is well for Linux gcc because > I use > the "(default)" case (i.e., everyt

Re: [Plplot-devel] MinGW 4.3.1 fortran 77 troubles

2008-09-07 Thread Alan W. Irwin
On 2008-09-08 06:44+0200 Arjen Markus wrote: >> Hi, >> >> the email below was somehow never sent, since it stayed in my Drafts >> folder, so I send it again. >> >> Werner >> >> Ok, >> >> one step forward. The import library libplplotf77cd.dll.a (to which is >> linked to) doesn't contain any symbol

Re: [Plplot-devel] MinGW 4.3.1 fortran 77 troubles

2008-09-07 Thread Arjen Markus
> Hi, > > the email below was somehow never sent, since it stayed in my Drafts > folder, so I send it again. > > Werner > > Ok, > > one step forward. The import library libplplotf77cd.dll.a (to which is > linked to) doesn't contain any symbols. If I change in plstubs.h > STUB_LAU to > > #define FNA

Re: [Plplot-devel] MinGW 4.3.1 fortran 77 troubles

2008-09-07 Thread Alan W. Irwin
On 2008-09-07 22:27+0200 Werner Smekal wrote: > Hi, > > the email below was somehow never sent, since it stayed in my Drafts folder, > so I send it again. > > Werner > > Ok, > > one step forward. The import library libplplotf77cd.dll.a (to which is > linked to) doesn't contain any symbols. If I c

Re: [Plplot-devel] MinGW 4.3.1 fortran 77 troubles

2008-09-07 Thread Werner Smekal
Hi, the email below was somehow never sent, since it stayed in my Drafts folder, so I send it again. Werner Ok, one step forward. The import library libplplotf77cd.dll.a (to which is linked to) doesn't contain any symbols. If I change in plstubs.h STUB_LAU to #define FNAME(x,y) PLDLLIMPE

Re: [Plplot-devel] time

2008-09-07 Thread Steve Schwartz
Hi Alan, On Sat, 2008-09-06 at 13:22 -0700, Alan W. Irwin wrote: > I suggest we specify our continuous time variable as a TT Julian day > number Personally I think this is nearly as good, or bad, as any other choice because it will suit some people and confuse others. I would like to draw a disti