Re: [Plplot-devel] Compile issues with latest svn

Hi Orion, On 30.04.2009, at 00:47, Orion Poplawski wrote: > CMake Error: File /usr/share/cmake/Modules/CMakeDCompiler.cmake.in > does > not exist. > CMake Error at cmake/modules/CMakeDetermineDCompiler.cmake:102 > (CONFIGURE_FILE): > configure_file Problem configuring file > > Call Stack (mos

[Plplot-devel] 5.9.3 Release Timing

My plan is to create the release Sunday afternoon (EST). -Hazen -- Register Now & Save for Velocity, the Web Performance & Operations Conference from O'Reilly Media. Velocity features a full day of expert-led, hands-o

Re: [Plplot-devel] cmake troubles, user error?

On Wednesday, April 29, 2009 at 21:58:03 (+0100) Andrew Ross writes: > Further testing has shown that I can get rid of the segmentation fault by > removing the call to XInitThreads in the OpenXwin function in xwin.c. > According to the Xlib documentation: > > "The XInitThreads() function in

Re: [Plplot-devel] Compile issues with latest svn

On 2009-04-29 16:47-0600 Orion Poplawski wrote: [...]what's the status of gnome2 and pygcw (PLD_gcw)? Are they still > supported? See announcement V in README.release. Alan __ Alan W. Irwin Astronomical research affiliation with Department of Physics and Astronomy, Univ

[Plplot-devel] Compile issues with latest svn

CMake Error: File /usr/share/cmake/Modules/CMakeDCompiler.cmake.in does not exist. CMake Error at cmake/modules/CMakeDetermineDCompiler.cmake:102 (CONFIGURE_FILE): configure_file Problem configuring file Call Stack (most recent call first): cmake/modules/d.cmake:33 (include) cmake/

Re: [Plplot-devel] cmake troubles, user error?

On 2009-04-29 21:58+0100 Andrew Ross wrote: > [...]Perhaps we should stick with disabling pthread support > entirely for now, then make the change after the release to > allow proper testing? Congratulations for getting so far with figuring out this mess. In your shoes I might be tempted to make

Re: [Plplot-devel] cmake troubles, user error?

On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 08:57:16PM -0500, Geoffrey Furnish wrote: > Andrew Ross writes: > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 09:40:14AM -0700, Alan Irwin wrote: > > > On 2009-04-28 10:45+0100 Andrew Ross wrote: > > > > > I tried this but it produces a rather curious result. I added a call to > > plseto

[Plplot-devel] Time handling plans after the release

Here are the items on my ToDo list for time handling after this weekend's release of PLplot. Most of these items have been mentioned before, but I thought I should collect everything in one place, and the first two items are entirely new. * Change the libqsastime API. This has not been mentioned

Re: [Plplot-devel] New time API that is based on libqsastime has been implemented for PLplot

On 2009-04-29 09:54+0100 Andrew Ross wrote: > [...]back them out for now so > that all the examples are consistent? This could help ensure that we > don't get bogus bug reports about ctest compare failing. Good idea. DONE (revision 9865). Alan __ Alan W. Irwin Astronomi

[Plplot-devel] Results of some tests

Hello, I want to report the results from a few tests regarding the next release. So far I have tested the following platforms: 1. Cygwin: shared library + dynamic drivers 2. Cygwin: static library + static drivers 3. Bare Windows: shared library + dynamic drivers ad 1. General: CMake under Cygwin

Re: [Plplot-devel] New time API that is based on libqsastime has been implemented for PLplot

Alan, If the changes to example 29 are incomplete, do you want to leave them in place for the release, or would be better to back them out for now so that all the examples are consistent? This could help ensure that we don't get bogus bug reports about ctest compare failing. Andre On Tue, Apr