Re: [Plplot-devel] Time to bump version to 5.9.3 in svn?

2009-04-30 Thread Alan W. Irwin
On 2009-04-30 14:32-0500 Maurice LeBrun wrote: > On Thursday, April 30, 2009 at 19:48:40 (+0100) Andrew Ross writes: > > I quite like your idea of something like 5.9.2+ though as it is simple. > > Just wanted to point out a potential downside.. if anyone does version number > parsing & expects num

Re: [Plplot-devel] Time to bump version to 5.9.3 in svn?

2009-04-30 Thread Maurice LeBrun
On Thursday, April 30, 2009 at 19:48:40 (+0100) Andrew Ross writes: > I quite like your idea of something like 5.9.2+ though as it is simple. Just wanted to point out a potential downside.. if anyone does version number parsing & expects numeric fields throughout, their code will likely barf on t

Re: [Plplot-devel] Time to bump version to 5.9.3 in svn?

2009-04-30 Thread Alan W. Irwin
On 2009-04-30 19:52+0100 Andrew Ross wrote: > On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 09:30:16AM -0700, Alan Irwin wrote: >> On 2009-04-30 09:23-0600 Orion Poplawski wrote: >> >>> Time to bump version to 5.9.3 in svn? >> >> Good question. >> >> Normally, all version bumps (overall release version, library version

Re: [Plplot-devel] cmake troubles, user error?

2009-04-30 Thread Maurice LeBrun
On Thursday, April 30, 2009 at 10:07:26 (+0100) Andrew Ross writes: > I think I have convinced myself that XInitThreads is needed for the Tk case > since > we don't control all the Xlib calls. A quick web search suggests our symptoms > are probably a result of Xlib calls being made before XIn

Re: [Plplot-devel] Time to bump version to 5.9.3 in svn?

2009-04-30 Thread Andrew Ross
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 09:30:16AM -0700, Alan Irwin wrote: > On 2009-04-30 09:23-0600 Orion Poplawski wrote: > >> Time to bump version to 5.9.3 in svn? > > Good question. > > Normally, all version bumps (overall release version, library version > numbers, etc.) occur as part of the release process

Re: [Plplot-devel] Time to bump version to 5.9.3 in svn?

2009-04-30 Thread Andrew Ross
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 09:30:16AM -0700, Alan Irwin wrote: > On 2009-04-30 09:23-0600 Orion Poplawski wrote: > > > Time to bump version to 5.9.3 in svn? > > Good question. > > Normally, all version bumps (overall release version, library version > numbers, etc.) occur as part of the release pro

Re: [Plplot-devel] Time to bump version to 5.9.3 in svn?

2009-04-30 Thread Alan W. Irwin
On 2009-04-30 09:23-0600 Orion Poplawski wrote: > Time to bump version to 5.9.3 in svn? Good question. Normally, all version bumps (overall release version, library version numbers, etc.) occur as part of the release process (see README.Release_Manager_Cookbook). So the overall version bump to 5

[Plplot-devel] Time to bump version to 5.9.3 in svn?

2009-04-30 Thread Orion Poplawski
Time to bump version to 5.9.3 in svn? -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com ---

Re: [Plplot-devel] Compile issues with latest svn

2009-04-30 Thread Orion Poplawski
Werner Smekal wrote: > Hi Orion, > > On 30.04.2009, at 00:47, Orion Poplawski wrote: > >> CMake Error: File /usr/share/cmake/Modules/CMakeDCompiler.cmake.in does >> not exist. >> CMake Error at cmake/modules/CMakeDetermineDCompiler.cmake:102 >> (CONFIGURE_FILE): >> configure_file Problem config

Re: [Plplot-devel] cmake troubles, user error?

2009-04-30 Thread Andrew Ross
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 10:03:44PM -0500, Maurice LeBrun wrote: > On Wednesday, April 29, 2009 at 21:58:03 (+0100) Andrew Ross writes: > > Further testing has shown that I can get rid of the segmentation fault by > > removing the call to XInitThreads in the OpenXwin function in xwin.c. > > Acc