Re: [Plplot-devel] Gradient status report

2009-12-02 Thread Alan W. Irwin
I have now finished propagating plgradient to the c++, d, f77, f95, java, lua, and python bindings and the corresponding examples 25 and 30 that use plgradient. All give identical results to the corresponding C results. (Ignore the comment about lua issues for example 30 in the commit message. Tha

Re: [Plplot-devel] Gradient status report

2009-12-02 Thread Arjen Markus
Hi Alan, ah, I will have a look at that - I checked the F77 case and realised why the plfill and plline entries were missing. For F95 we have Fortran wrappers that ultimately call the C versions. The reason is that we can then hide the parameter for the number of points (that is one other reason f

Re: [Plplot-devel] Gradient status report

2009-12-02 Thread Alan W. Irwin
On 2009-12-02 09:18+0100 Arjen Markus wrote: > Hi Alan, > > On 2009-12-02 08:04, Alan W. Irwin wrote: > >> f77 and f95 have also been completed as of revision 10665. For both f77 and >> f95 there appear to be some *.def file updates still to do for plgradient. >> I assume the windows Fortran 77 an

Re: [Plplot-devel] Gradient status report

2009-12-02 Thread Arjen Markus
Hi Alan, On 2009-12-02 08:04, Alan W. Irwin wrote: > f77 and f95 have also been completed as of revision 10665. For both f77 and > f95 there appear to be some *.def file updates still to do for plgradient. > I assume the windows Fortran 77 and 95 example builds will be broken because > of that la