Re: [Plplot-devel] Another weird WITH_FREETYPE=OFF thing

2010-01-28 Thread Alan W. Irwin
On 2010-01-28 16:47-0800 David MacMahon wrote: > > On Jan 28, 2010, at 5:06 , Alan W. Irwin wrote: > >> On 2010-01-27 23:04-0800 David MacMahon wrote: >> >>> Is it generally OK to send patches to plplot-devel [...] >> >> Yes. Sending patches to plplot-devel as a compressed attachment is the >>

Re: [Plplot-devel] Another weird WITH_FREETYPE=OFF thing

2010-01-28 Thread David MacMahon
On Jan 27, 2010, at 23:49 , Arjen Markus wrote: > that is a remarkable piece of detective work. Thanks! > you have digged up is a rahter nasty feature here. Agreed! > I agree that option 3b looks the cleanest. It should not be > too hard to implement it - the build system has several examples

[Plplot-devel] [PATCH] Fix command line parsing bug for Mac OS X

2010-01-28 Thread David MacMahon
Mac OS X has a global version of argc and argv. The global argv is passed by reference into main, but the global argc is passed by value. When c_plparseopts deletes arguments, it reduces the caller's argc value and NULL terminates the argv array to match. The global argc and argv must also be ke

Re: [Plplot-devel] Another weird WITH_FREETYPE=OFF thing

2010-01-28 Thread David MacMahon
On Jan 28, 2010, at 5:06 , Alan W. Irwin wrote: > On 2010-01-27 23:04-0800 David MacMahon wrote: > >> Is it generally OK to send patches to plplot-devel [...] > > Yes. Sending patches to plplot-devel as a compressed attachment is > the > preferred method. Thanks. Do you know what the size li

Re: [Plplot-devel] Mix-up of Tcl versions under Linux in PLplot 5.9.5

2010-01-28 Thread Alan W. Irwin
On 2010-01-28 14:23+0100 Arjen Markus wrote: > Hi Alan, > > no, I did not - PLplot builds fine., but you may be correct > about it not being enough - I will look further (no time right > now, I am afraid) Hi Arjen: I decided to have a look at this because like Andrew and you I have several versi

Re: [Plplot-devel] Mix-up of Tcl versions under Linux in PLplot 5.9.5

2010-01-28 Thread Arjen Markus
Hi Alan, no, I did not - PLplot builds fine., but you may be correct about it not being enough - I will look further (no time right now, I am afraid) Regards, Arjen On 2010-01-28 14:14, Alan W. Irwin wrote: > On 2010-01-28 08:54+0100 Arjen Markus wrote: > >> Hi Andrew, >> >> I solved the issue

Re: [Plplot-devel] Mix-up of Tcl versions under Linux in PLplot 5.9.5

2010-01-28 Thread Alan W. Irwin
On 2010-01-28 08:54+0100 Arjen Markus wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > I solved the issue by using the macros TCL_MAJOR_VERSION and > TCL_MINOR_VERSION. That way building the Tcl/Tk bindings for PLplot > is independent of the version of tclsh, but instead relies exclusively > on the Tcl include files. Hi

Re: [Plplot-devel] Another weird WITH_FREETYPE=OFF thing

2010-01-28 Thread Alan W. Irwin
On 2010-01-27 23:04-0800 David MacMahon wrote: > Is it generally OK to send patches to plplot-devel [...] Yes. Sending patches to plplot-devel as a compressed attachment is the preferred method. Alan __ Alan W. Irwin Astronomical research affiliation with Department of