Re: [Plplot-devel] Fwd: [Plplot-cvs] SF.net SVN: plplot:[11004] trunk/cmake/modules/python.cmake

2010-05-19 Thread Alan W. Irwin
On 2010-05-19 09:09+0100 Andrew Ross wrote: > Makes sense. I'm not sure the naming conventions here are particularly > sensible. > Perhaps FORCE_NUMERIC would be better? Definitely more descriptive. I have made that change (plus a bit more) in revision 11014. I have done some light testing of

Re: [Plplot-devel] Current test_diff_psc results

2010-05-19 Thread Arjen Markus
Hello, I had a look yesterday at the Tcl examples and at the way we produce the bindings for Tcl and suddenly realised that we do not use the stubs mechanism, even though the source code is prepared for them (it requires a flag USE_TCL_STUBS and linking against the stubs library). The advantage o

Re: [Plplot-devel] Fwd: [Plplot-cvs] SF.net SVN: plplot:[11004] trunk/cmake/modules/python.cmake

2010-05-19 Thread Andrew Ross
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 11:45:09PM -0700, Alan Irwin wrote: > On 2010-05-18 15:18+0100 Andrew Ross wrote: > >> >> Werner, >> >> Fair point. I'll look at it later. > > Hi Andrew: > > I also thought Werner had a good idea. > > Your further change to implement that only made sense to me with one furth

Re: [Plplot-devel] Current test_diff_psc results

2010-05-19 Thread Jerry
I'll get the Ada up to speed soon. Jerry On May 18, 2010, at 7:27 AM, Andrew Ross wrote: > Ada, lua and d are still awaiting the porting of plstransform and > examples. Volunteers? -- __