Thanks for spotting this. Now fixed in svn.
Andrew
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 07:05:23PM +0200, SourceForge.net wrote:
> Bugs item #3404359, was opened at 2011-09-05 19:05
> Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by slayoo
> You can respond by visiting:
> https://sourceforge.ne
On Sat, Sep 03, 2011 at 10:47:52PM +0100, Andrew Ross wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 09:56:57PM -0700, Alan Irwin wrote:
> >
> > I was going to suggest you try preprocessing tricks, until I realized
> > that is probably what you meant by (1) rather than literal patching
> > with the patch progra
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 10:13:57AM +0100, Andrew Ross wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 01:18:33AM -0700, Alan Irwin wrote:
>
> > The problems could be caused by bugs in how certain specific versions
> > of libraries use atexit or could be caused by them simply starting to
> > use atexit at some ve
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 01:18:33AM -0700, Alan Irwin wrote:
> Hi Andrew:
>
> On 2011-09-05 22:58+0100 Andrew Ross wrote:
>
>> Alan,
>
>> [...]The fact that this occurs in the dynamic loader handling code makes
>> me suspect a linkage bug somewhere along the line. I tried a minimal
>> build inside t
Hi Andrew:
On 2011-09-05 22:58+0100 Andrew Ross wrote:
> Alan,
> [...]The fact that this occurs in the dynamic loader handling code makes
> me suspect a linkage bug somewhere along the line. I tried a minimal
> build inside the Debian testing chroot (no fancy packaging stuff)
> and lo and behold
