On 2014-08-17 06:29-0700 phil rosenberg wrote:
Hi Alan
I'm not great with shell scripts - I use them so infrequently I never remember
the syntax. However I have quickly tried to modify the hook
fromhttps://gist.github.com/caniszczyk/1327469. Basically you are trying to do
something like:
git
On 2014-08-16 22:55-0400 Hazen Babcock wrote:
> On 8/16/2014 1:50 PM, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
>> On 2014-08-16 06:50-0400 Hezekiah M. Carty wrote:
>>
>>> I agree with Hazen here - adding hooks on day one seems overkill for
>>> the project. [...]
>>> Given that the project and developers are overall
On 2014-08-17 05:52-0700 phil rosenberg wrote:
> Hi Hazen and Alan
> Did you see the email I sent last night saying you can tag a branch head,
> then if the branch is deleted the tag remains?
> This makes it trivial to delete branches but make sure they can be restored
> providing nobody deletes
On 2014-08-17 07:56-0400 Hazen Babcock wrote:
> On 8/17/2014 2:41 AM, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
>> On 2014-08-16 22:37-0400 Hazen Babcock wrote:
>>>
>>> "git reflog doesn't traverse HEAD's ancestry at all. The reflog is an
>>> ordered list of the commits that HEAD has pointed to: it's undo
>>> history
Hi, Alan,
On Aug 16, 2014, at 11:03 AM, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> Ideas from the git gurus, please.
I think the ongoing concern/discussion of deleting branches in git might be due
to a lingering svn mindset vis a vis branching. I could be wrong, but I think
deleting a branch in subversion also d
Sorry, replied rather than replied to all with this - Alan please see below
From: phil rosenberg
To: Hazen Babcock
Sent: Sunday, 17 August 2014, 13:44
Subject: Re: [Plplot-devel] Trying to understand how git workflow for CMake is
enforced
Hi Alan
I'm
Hi Hazen and Alan
Did you see the email I sent last night saying you can tag a branch head, then
if the branch is deleted the tag remains?
This makes it trivial to delete branches but make sure they can be restored
providing nobody deletes the tag - and even if they did you could probably
search
On 8/17/2014 2:41 AM, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> On 2014-08-16 22:37-0400 Hazen Babcock wrote:
>>
>> "git reflog doesn't traverse HEAD's ancestry at all. The reflog is an
>> ordered list of the commits that HEAD has pointed to: it's undo
>> history for your repo. The reflog isn't part of the repo itsel
