Hi Alan,
I was unhappily surprised myself about this. For several years MinGW has been a
comfortable platform for testing PLplot.
One thing I did notice is that MinGW does not come with a make utility anymore
- there is one under MSYS, but that misbehaves if I put that in the path (it
Hi Alan,
I like that idea of providing a dual set of interfaces very much :). Yes, I
will take that responsibility. The details may need some iteration but at first
sight this looks good!
Regards,
Arjen
-Original Message-
From: Alan W. Irwin [mailto:ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca]
On 2014-10-16 06:44- Arjen Markus wrote:
Hi Alan,
I like that idea of providing a dual set of interfaces [for
single/double floating point precision for Fortran independent of C core
floating precision] very much :).
Excellent.
Yes, I will take that responsibility. The details may need
On 2014-10-15 10:28- Arjen Markus wrote:
Hi everyone,
I am trying to test the build under MinGW/MSYS, but I have run into a
problem with the device drivers:
The example programs can not find them, unless I set PLPLOT_DRV_DIR to the
directory containing the .driver_info files.
Hi Alan,
You provide enough details so that I can reproduce your steps. Hopefully I can
do that this weekend.
Regards,
Arjen
-Original Message-
From: Alan W. Irwin [mailto:ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca]
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2014 10:39 AM
To: Arjen Markus
Cc: PLplot
Alan,
That sounds like a good idea. There have been a number of useful
improvements / fixes since then. We definitely want to try and
get the various language bindings and examples back into sync
before then. I've now done the C++ examples to get the process
started.
Andrew
On Tue, Oct 14,
Hi Andrew:
I just noticed that the set_stream() call was commented out in
bindings/c++/plstream.cc for plstream::fill, plstream::fill3, and
plstream::gradient while it appears in all (as far as I can tell) other
calls. Why are those 3 functions exceptions, or is this a minor bug
that has
On 2014-10-16 14:20+0100 Andrew Ross wrote:
Alan,
That sounds like a good idea. There have been a number of useful
improvements / fixes since then. We definitely want to try and
get the various language bindings and examples back into sync
before then. I've now done the C++ examples to get
On 2014-10-16 08:41- Arjen Markus wrote:
[...]You provide enough details so that I can reproduce your steps. Hopefully
I can do that this weekend.
Hi Arjen:
Since it appears the regression is not due to CMake or PLplot version
changes since the last comprehensive MinGW/MSYS tests were
Alan,
It's because these three functions are callback functions which are
called from another plplot function. They do not operate directly on
a stream.
The C++ class maintains a stream variable for each instance of the
PLStream class. This means you can have multiple streams (i.e. windows
/
On 2014-10-16 14:20+0100 Andrew Ross wrote:
[A release] sounds like a good idea. There have been a number of useful
improvements / fixes since [February].
I agree a release fairly soon is a good idea because I don't want to
disappoint anyone whose work remains unreleased because there has
11 matches
Mail list logo
