Hi Alan,
> -Original Message-
> From: Alan W. Irwin [mailto:ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca]
>
> That is a pretty cool automated script for running the test and collecting
> all relevant
> results into a tarball. The only thing I would add to it is
>
> rm -rf ../comprehensive_test_disposeabl
Hi Alan,
> -Original Message-
> From: Alan W. Irwin [mailto:ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca]
>
> That is good news indeed. So it appears we finally have a good baseline
> result for
> Cygwin without any brute force changes.
> I am well aware you have been contributing a lot of your time to a
On 2015-04-19 14:15- Arjen Markus wrote:
> Hi Alan,
>
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Alan W. Irwin [mailto:ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca]
>>
>> When rewriting this PATH manipulation logic after the 5.11.0 release I
>> screwed up
>> one aspect (forgot the nondynamic case), and your tes
On 2015-04-19 15:32-0700 Alan W. Irwin wrote:
On 2015-04-19 15:08- Arjen Markus wrote:
[ B]y running the example as built in the
comprehensive_test_disposeable directory, I found what was wrong: my
script did not set the PLPLOT_DRV_DIR environment variable, so that
the example could n
Thanks for the feedback Alan.
I have removed the -DPLD_wxpng:BOOL=ON option and it is all working well
now. Thanks!
Regards,
Ben
On Fri, 17 Apr 2015 at 9:23 am Alan W. Irwin
wrote:
> On 2015-04-16 22:48- Ben Woods wrote:
>
> > Hey everyone,
> >
> > I'm trying to build plplot 5.11.0 on FreeB
On 2015-04-19 15:08- Arjen Markus wrote:
> [ B]y running the example as built in the
comprehensive_test_disposeable directory, I found what was wrong: my
script did not set the PLPLOT_DRV_DIR environment variable, so that
the example could not detect which drivers were available. After
cor
Hi Alan,
> -Original Message-
> From: Alan W. Irwin [mailto:ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca]
>
> Your actual script output is
> [...]
> This variable specifies whether any windows platform has been detected
> ANY_WINDOWS_PLATFORM=true
>
> Each of the steps in this comprehensive test may take a
On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 09:56:47AM +0100, Andrew Ross wrote:
>
> I didn't want to comment on your code, but that was the impression I got!
> I am using g++-4.9, but I did the g++ --verbose --version test on Ubuntu
> versions back to 4.4 and all used the colon. I agree, dropping it is
> perhaps the
On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 05:00:52PM -0700, Alan Irwin wrote:
> On 2015-04-18 22:56+0100 Andrew Ross wrote:
>
> >
> >Alan,
> >
> >I've finally got time to rerun my comnprehensive tests with Ubuntu 14.10
> >and try to debug the niggle issues I encountered with the static build
> >
> >(My only change
