Re: [Plplot-devel] comprehensive testing results on Cygwin [POSSIBLE SOLUTION?]

2016-03-16 Thread Arjen Markus
Hi Alan, > -Original Message- > From: Alan W. Irwin [mailto:ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca] > > Thanks for that explanation of the concise versus expanded error messages. > It still > leaves two big question though which is why the artificial error in > Tcl_GetMatrixPtr > generated by my l

Re: [Plplot-devel] comprehensive testing results on Cygwin [POSSIBLE SOLUTION?]

2016-03-16 Thread Alan W. Irwin
On 2016-03-16 08:04- Arjen Markus wrote: >> So for this case it appears there are consistent >> >> Matrix operator "x" already in use >> >> basic error messages between the two methods. but that basic error message is >> not at all consistent with the above naive interpretation of what should

Re: [Plplot-devel] git blog

2016-03-16 Thread Arjen Markus
Hi Alan, > -Original Message- > From: Alan W. Irwin [mailto:ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca] > Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2016 10:08 AM > To: Arjen Markus > Cc: PLplot development list > Subject: git blog > > On 2016-03-16 08:04- Arjen Markus wrote: > > > By the way, your most recent commi

[Plplot-devel] git blog

2016-03-16 Thread Alan W. Irwin
On 2016-03-16 08:04- Arjen Markus wrote: > By the way, your most recent commits did not show up in the log. But when I did "git merge -ff-only origin/master" I did get the changes. Very odd. Probably not that odd. "git log" generates the log _for the current branch_. So if you had checked o

Re: [Plplot-devel] comprehensive testing results on Cygwin [POSSIBLE SOLUTION?]

2016-03-16 Thread Arjen Markus
Hi Alan, > -Original Message- > From: Alan W. Irwin [mailto:ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca] ... > > [...] > > *** PLPLOT WARNING *** > > plmaptex is a no-op because shapelib is not available. > > No matrix operator named "62" > > > > So from that last line I am pretty sure that the "62" in >