Re: [Plplot-devel] Recent progress with wxwidgets IPC

2017-02-06 Thread Alan W. Irwin
On 2017-02-06 23:52- p.d.rosenb...@gmail.com wrote: > Hi Alan > Not exactly sure what you mean by complex? It is not always possible to send all data, as the shared memory is finite size and therefore the data to be sent may be bigger than the shared memory. Hi Phil: To get a preview of wha

Re: [Plplot-devel] Recent progress with wxwidgets IPC

2017-02-06 Thread p.d.rosenberg
Hi Alan Not exactly sure what you mean by complex? It is not always possible to send all data, as the shared memory is finite size and therefore the data to be sent may be bigger than the shared memory. The reading and writing is therefore set up as a ring buffer, so when the writing gets to the

Re: [Plplot-devel] Recent progress with wxwidgets IPC

2017-02-06 Thread Alan W. Irwin
On 2017-02-04 19:41-0800 Alan W. Irwin wrote: > So in the ideal case (where all steps below ultimately work and there > are no efficiency reductions due to any of these steps) the remaining > planned steps in this development effort for the > -DPL_HAVE_UNNAMED_POSIX_SEMAPHORES=ON case are as follo