Arjen Markus wrote:
Here is the current status for f77 and f95:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scripts/check_api_completeness.sh f77 |grep '[+-]' |grep -v
'@@' |grep -v '\-\-\-' |grep -v '+++'
-plarrows
-plenv0
-plgcolbga
-plgfci
-plimage
-plimagefr
-plot3dcl
+plsetmapformc
-plsfci
-plsurf3dl
[EMAIL PRO
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 04:48:27PM -0700, Alan Irwin wrote:
> There are a large variety of hand-crafted files in our source tree which
> specify the public API for some component of PLplot, and it is very easy for
> these files to get out of synch. Therefore, I have just committed a script
> calle
Alan W. Irwin wrote:
On 2008-03-10 08:54+0100 Arjen Markus wrote:
I do not mind a "7" instead of a "C" - it simply seemed a good idea at
the time,
as they figure in the FORTRAN 77 and the Fortran 95 bindings and work around
a calling convention difference with C.
Hi Arjen:
Following
On 2008-03-10 08:54+0100 Arjen Markus wrote:
> I do not mind a "7" instead of a "C" - it simply seemed a good idea at
> the time,
> as they figure in the FORTRAN 77 and the Fortran 95 bindings and work around
> a calling convention difference with C.
Hi Arjen:
Following up on your above comment,
Alan W. Irwin wrote:
>There are a large variety of hand-crafted files in our source tree which
>specify the public API for some component of PLplot, and it is very easy for
>these files to get out of synch. Therefore, I have just committed a script
>called scripts/check_api_completeness.sh that c
There are a large variety of hand-crafted files in our source tree which
specify the public API for some component of PLplot, and it is very easy for
these files to get out of synch. Therefore, I have just committed a script
called scripts/check_api_completeness.sh that checks whether at least the
