On 2007-10-16 21:18-0400 Hazen Babcock wrote:
>
> On Oct 14, 2007, at 1:03 PM, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
>
>> On 2007-09-28 10:45-0700 Alan W. Irwin wrote:
>>
>> Assuming the platform testing of these Ada changes and the platform
>> testing
>> (especially Orion's Fedora platform) of the recent octave
On Oct 14, 2007, at 1:03 PM, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> On 2007-09-28 10:45-0700 Alan W. Irwin wrote:
>
> Assuming the platform testing of these Ada changes and the platform
> testing
> (especially Orion's Fedora platform) of the recent octave changes
> goes well,
> I think we are ready for the r
On 2007-09-28 10:45-0700 Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> On 2007-09-28 01:46-0700 Jerry wrote:
>>
>> The other way, very similar, would for me to keep the same number of
>> binding files and let the build system take care of the sed stuff and
>> create derived files with standardized names.[...]
>
> Here i
On 2007-09-28 01:46-0700 Jerry wrote:
> [...]Since the c.l.a. list strongly suggested, in any case, multiple
> source files, it seems to me that we could take one of two routes.
> One is for me to supply two sets of files, one that compiles with Ada
> 95 and one that compiles with Ada 2007. Since
I'd like to raise a possibility about a better way to handle the Ada
bindings. Here's the deal.
There has been a recent new standard for the Ada language, known
frequently as Ada 2005, Ada 05, Ada 2007 or Ada 07. (The most
frequent is Ada 2005 although the standard was not officially
appro
