On 2014-09-24 11:00-0700 David MacMahon wrote:
> Hi, Alan,
>
> On Sep 23, 2014, at 10:41 PM, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
>
>> On 2014-09-23 16:01-0700 David MacMahon wrote:
>>
>>> Just to nit pick: [...]
>>
>> Your comment above caught this nit-picker's attention. :-)
>
> Takes one to know one! :-) :-)
Hi, Alan,
On Sep 23, 2014, at 10:41 PM, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> On 2014-09-23 16:01-0700 David MacMahon wrote:
>
>> Just to nit pick: [...]
>
> Your comment above caught this nit-picker's attention. :-)
Takes one to know one! :-) :-) :-)
> What I was referring to (see README.developers) is we
On 2014-09-23 16:01-0700 David MacMahon wrote:
> Just to nit pick: isn't this more of a pre-push check rather than
client side enforcement? Nit picking aside, I agree that with
rebase-only it easier to check for potential push problems on the
client side *before* pushing.
Hi David:
Your comment
Hi, Alan,
On Sep 23, 2014, at 12:35 PM, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> On 2014-09-23 09:54-0700 David MacMahon wrote:
>
>> Emailing patches is tedious and error prone.
>
> I disagree. I have been applying user-generated patches to PLplot for
> years without any patch-related errors. And I really like
Hi David:
I changed the subject line to something more appropriate.
On 2014-09-23 09:54-0700 David MacMahon wrote:
> Hi, Alan,
>
> On Sep 22, 2014, at 12:37 PM, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
>
>> You are much more experienced with git than me. However, I thought
>> that rebasing a public branch was alwa
