On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 09:40:31PM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> Andrew Ross wrote:
> > As you may have noticed, I've commited some changes to the octave
> > bindings in svn. As a result it is now possible to build plplot using
> > octave 2.9.
> >
> > Note that the higher level functions reprod
Andrew Ross wrote:
> As you may have noticed, I've commited some changes to the octave
> bindings in svn. As a result it is now possible to build plplot using
> octave 2.9.
>
> Note that the higher level functions reproduce the old functionality
> under octave 2.1. They do not (yet) provide the e
On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 03:41:49PM -0700, Alan Irwin wrote:
> On 2007-10-12 21:52+0100 Andrew Ross wrote:
>
> >
> >As you may have noticed, I've commited some changes to the octave
> >bindings in svn. As a result it is now possible to build plplot using
> >octave 2.9.
> >
> >The basic plplot bindi
On 2007-10-12 21:52+0100 Andrew Ross wrote:
>
> As you may have noticed, I've commited some changes to the octave
> bindings in svn. As a result it is now possible to build plplot using
> octave 2.9.
>
> The basic plplot bindings work fine (as far as I can tell). All the
> x??.m scripts produce id
As you may have noticed, I've commited some changes to the octave
bindings in svn. As a result it is now possible to build plplot using
octave 2.9.
The basic plplot bindings work fine (as far as I can tell). All the
x??.m scripts produce identical results to the C equivalents.
There were vario
