.
Regards,
Arjen
> -Original Message-
> From: Alan W. Irwin [mailto:ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 11:17 AM
> To: Arjen Markus
> Cc: Phil Rosenberg; plplot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: RE: [Plplot-devel] Question about plbtime and p
On 2015-01-20 09:28- Arjen Markus wrote:
> Hi Phil, Alan,
> I like the idea of a PLTIMEFLT type, it expresses precisely what the
variable is intended to be – it is not just a raw double. There would
not be an actual incompatibility, just a refinement.
I think it is an elaboration that won't
: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 9:38 AM
To: Alan W. Irwin; Arjen Markus
Cc: plplot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [Plplot-devel] Question about plbtime and plctime
I am more inclined to agree with Arjen. A time interface, without the ability
to represent time to the accuracy we display it is to
ginal Message-
From: "Alan W. Irwin"
Sent: 20/01/2015 02:27
To: "Arjen Markus"
Cc: "plplot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net"
Subject: Re: [Plplot-devel] Question about plbtime and plctime
On 2015-01-19 11:11- Arjen Markus wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> While wo
On 2015-01-19 11:11- Arjen Markus wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> While working on the dual interface to the Plplot core functions for
Fortran (that is: both single and double precision at the same time),
I stumbled upon the interface for plbtime and plctime (possibly also
plconfigtime, but I have no
Hi everyone,
While working on the dual interface to the Plplot core functions for Fortran
(that is: both single and double precision at the same time), I stumbled upon
the interface for plbtime and plctime (possibly also plconfigtime, but I have
not looked at that yet). I think our current use
