gt;
>
>
>
> From: Arjen Markus [mailto:arjen.mar...@deltares.nl]
> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2015 12:26 PM
> To: Phil Rosenberg
>
>
> Cc: plplot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Plplot-devel] Shapefile incorrectly displayed
>
>
>
> Hi Phil,
>
>
@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Plplot-devel] Shapefile incorrectly displayed
Hi Phil,
Thanks for the update - the prj-file should be available somewhere ... Ah, I
see: for this particular file it was missing. I have a number of additional
shapefiles for the same area and the same projection and they have
.
Regards,
Arjen
> -Original Message-
> From: Phil Rosenberg [mailto:p.d.rosenb...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2015 11:52 AM
> To: Arjen Markus
> Cc: plplot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Plplot-devel] Shapefile incorrectly displayed
&g
attachments), let me know. (Sending it directly to
>> you seemed to me to put less strain on the mailing list.)
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>
>>
>> Arjen
>>
>>
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Phil Rosenberg [mailto
gt;
>
> Arjen
>
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Phil Rosenberg [mailto:p.d.rosenb...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Monday, March 23, 2015 5:44 PM
>> To: Arjen Markus
>> Cc: plplot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> Subject: Re: [Plplot-devel] Shapefile
.)
Regards,
Arjen
> -Original Message-
> From: Phil Rosenberg [mailto:p.d.rosenb...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 23, 2015 5:44 PM
> To: Arjen Markus
> Cc: plplot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Plplot-devel] Shapefile incorrectly displayed
>
> Hi Arjen
Hi Arjen
Could you send me the shapefile and all associated ancillary files and
I'll have a look it this?
Phil
On 20 March 2015 at 13:51, Arjen Markus wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
>
>
> I know we are in a code freeze, but I ran into a curious problem with the
> new plmapfill routines to handle “shape
Hi everyone,
I know we are in a code freeze, but I ran into a curious problem with the new
plmapfill routines to handle "shape files". While the Plplot example x19 works
very nicely, I have a shape file where this is not the case. It may have to do
with the use of UTM (x/y) coordinates instea