I have just implemented (but not yet committed) an epa_build option
for running the comprehensive test script for PLplot after PLplot (and
PLplot "lite") are built and installed by epa_build.
That comprehensive testing of epa_build results for PLplot immediately
showed some additional PLplot build
On 2013-12-11 21:40- Andrew Ross wrote:
> On Wednesday 11 Dec 2013 11:09:15 Andrew Ross wrote:
>
>> Yes, I've been using this option. Very handy. I've now got the test_diff_psc
>> resuilts valgrind clean for C and C++ with standard optimisation. I've not
>> (yet) tracked down the colorbar prob
On Wednesday 11 Dec 2013 11:09:15 Andrew Ross wrote:
> Yes, I've been using this option. Very handy. I've now got the test_diff_psc
> resuilts valgrind clean for C and C++ with standard optimisation. I've not
> (yet) tracked down the colorbar problem with -O3.
I've traced the problem back to th
On Wednesday 11 Dec 2013 11:42:20 Arjen Markus wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> the Fortran code that this valgrind error is pointing to is:
>
> close( 10, status = 'delete' )
>
> and that does not allow much variation. I can only imagine there is some
> issue in the gfortran runtime library that i
Hi Andrew,
the Fortran code that this valgrind error is pointing to is:
close( 10, status = 'delete' )
and that does not allow much variation. I can only imagine there is some issue
in the
gfortran runtime library that is causing this. It might be an idea to look into
this using
a small
On Tuesday 10 Dec 2013 19:00:09 Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> On 2013-12-11 01:26- Andrew Ross wrote:
> > On Monday 09 Dec 2013 13:09:29 Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> >> Hi Andrew:
> >>
> >> On 2013-12-09 19:59- Andrew Ross wrote:
> >>> I'll do some further testing, but unless I find any issues I don't
On 2013-12-11 01:26- Andrew Ross wrote:
> On Monday 09 Dec 2013 13:09:29 Alan W. Irwin wrote:
>> Hi Andrew:
>>
>> On 2013-12-09 19:59- Andrew Ross wrote:
>>> I'll do some further testing, but unless I find any issues I don't propose
>>> doing any further work before the release.
>>
>> Than
On Monday 09 Dec 2013 13:09:29 Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> Hi Andrew:
>
> On 2013-12-09 19:59- Andrew Ross wrote:
> > I'll do some further testing, but unless I find any issues I don't propose
> > doing any further work before the release.
>
> Thanks very much for your propagation efforts, testing
Hi Andrew:
On 2013-12-09 19:59- Andrew Ross wrote:
> I'll do some further testing, but unless I find any issues I don't propose
> doing any further work before the release.
Thanks very much for your propagation efforts, testing, and the fixes
you have generated as a result during this releas
On Sunday 08 Dec 2013 12:44:18 Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> On 2013-12-07 20:14-0500 Hezekiah M. Carty wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Andrew Ross
> >
> > wrote:
> >> On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 10:56:10PM -0800, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> >>> ocaml
> >>>
> >>>Missing examples:
>
On 2013-12-07 20:14-0500 Hezekiah M. Carty wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Andrew Ross
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 10:56:10PM -0800, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
>>> ocaml
>>>Missing examples:
>>>Differing postscript output : 16 22 33
>>>Missing stdout
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Andrew Ross
wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 10:56:10PM -0800, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
>> ocaml
>>Missing examples:
>>Differing postscript output : 16 22 33
>>Missing stdout :
>>Differing stdout:
>>
>> I expect th
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 11:22:04PM -0700, Jerry wrote:
> >
> > The remaining languages need updating. I will look at tcl next. I am
> > assuming Hez will take on the ocaml changes along with the changes to
> > examples 16 and 33. If someone is able to look at ada that would be
> > great, otherwise
On Nov 29, 2013, at 8:36 AM, Andrew Ross
wrote:
>
> Alan,
>
> Thanks for this. Once my example 22 changes are finished I intend
> doing some testing too on my Ubuntu system (and hopefully on Debian
> unstable). I agree we're still on track for 14th December release.
>
> See comments below ab
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 07:30:17AM +, Arjen Markus wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Andrew Ross [mailto:andrewr...@users.sourceforge.net]
> >
> > The example has been updated. The difference is because f95 version of
> > plshades
> > does not support the rect arg
Hi Andrew,
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Ross [mailto:andrewr...@users.sourceforge.net]
>
> The example has been updated. The difference is because f95 version of
> plshades
> does not support the rect argument. Once that is done
> (Arjen?) it is a one line fix.
>
I will have a loo
Here are my plans for the rest of this release cycle.
(Please keep in mind that all times/dates mentioned are in Pacific
time, UTC - 8:00.)
Until Thursday, December 12th (which is 10 days from now):
Respond to any build-system issues you guys may find with the first
round of platform testing I ha
Alan,
Thanks for this. Once my example 22 changes are finished I intend
doing some testing too on my Ubuntu system (and hopefully on Debian
unstable). I agree we're still on track for 14th December release.
See comments below about example 22 progress.
Andrew
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 10:56:10PM
Earlier today, I finished up the last of my planned test improvements
(extending the interactive testing done for the traditional build of
the installed examples to be comparable to the Tcl/Tk CMake-based
testing that is done for the core build tree and the installed
examples tree).
To establish a
19 matches
Mail list logo
