On 2008-01-15 15:08-0700 Orion Poplawski wrote:
> The latest version of itcl/itk in Fedora development shows up as version
> 3.4, so the following patch is needed:
[...]
Done (revision 8137).
> Note that I have to define ITCL_LIBRARY to /usr/lib/tcl8.5/libitcl3.4
> when I run the test as part o
Arjen Markus wrote:
>>> There is some effort by the Fedora maintainer to get it working:
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428083
>>>
>> I have heard that two members of the Tcl Core Team are working
>> on this issue as well. I will keep you posted about progress.
>>
>
> Orion,
>
>
>> There is some effort by the Fedora maintainer to get it working:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428083
>>
>
> I have heard that two members of the Tcl Core Team are working
> on this issue as well. I will keep you posted about progress.
>
Orion,
can you get Itcl/Itk from the C
On Wednesday, January 9, 2008 at 08:55:33 (-0600) Geoffrey Furnish writes:
> Maurice LeBrun writes:
> > On Tuesday, January 8, 2008 at 21:30:21 (-0700) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > > In fact, I can't tell any difference between what is built in the two
> > > versions. Does Itcl add anyth
> Maurice LeBrun wrote:
>> On Tuesday, January 8, 2008 at 16:11:13 (-0800) Alan W. Irwin writes:
>> > Maurice, there is a question at the end for you about the current
>> > status of itcl.
>> > ..
>> > N.B. itcl is not compatible with Tcl 8.5, and is probably going to be
>> a
>> > problem for
Maurice LeBrun wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 8, 2008 at 16:11:13 (-0800) Alan W. Irwin writes:
> > Maurice, there is a question at the end for you about the current
> > status of itcl.
> > ..
> > N.B. itcl is not compatible with Tcl 8.5, and is probably going to be a
> > problem for all future
Alan W. Irwin wrote:
>
> Orion, I was very glad to hear that svn trunk works for you now in your
> pure
> Tcl 8.5 environment with itcl/itk disabled. Do you want to try out the
> further test of enabling itcl/itk for PLplot for your environment? Since
> your environment (unlike mine) is pure Tcl
Maurice LeBrun writes:
> On Tuesday, January 8, 2008 at 21:30:21 (-0700) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > In fact, I can't tell any difference between what is built in the two
> > versions. Does Itcl add anything to plplot?
>
> A nicer file selector, I think that's it.
In the $prefix/share/p
>
> Maurice, I would appreciate your further comments on the itcl situation.
> Is
> it not compatible with tcl 8.5 because that version of Tcl uses its own OO
> approach or is OO not going to be available at all for the Tcl future
> unless
> somebody starts actively supporting itcl?
>
The traditi
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 08:43:46AM +0100, Arjen Markus wrote:
>> > Well, Tcl 8.5 has finally landed in Fedora Development again. You can
>> > see some results from earlier attempts here:
>> > http://www.mail-archive.com/plplot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg00440.html
>> >
>> > I've attached my
On 2008-01-08 22:56-0600 Maurice LeBrun wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 8, 2008 at 16:11:13 (-0800) Alan W. Irwin writes:
> > Maurice, there is a question at the end for you about the current
> > status of itcl.
> > ..
> > N.B. itcl is not compatible with Tcl 8.5, and is probably going to be a
> > pr
On Tuesday, January 8, 2008 at 21:30:21 (-0700) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > So my strong advice is to disable itcl and itk if you are going to try
> > Tcl/Tk 8.5. Orion, interference from itcl may be the cause of your ctest
> > time troubles with Tcl 8.5.
> >
>
> That was indeed the c
On Tuesday, January 8, 2008 at 16:11:13 (-0800) Alan W. Irwin writes:
> Maurice, there is a question at the end for you about the current
> status of itcl.
> ..
> N.B. itcl is not compatible with Tcl 8.5, and is probably going to be a
> problem for all future versions of Tcl because it appears
> Note, if you have Tcl 8.5 on your system you must specify the cmake option
> -DHAVE_TCL_GT_84=ON. Normally that option defaults to OFF. (Later, if my
> Tcl 8.5 changes work for everybody regardless of whether they have Tcl 8.4
> or 8.5, this crude approach should be replaced by a good automati
Maurice, there is a question at the end for you about the current
status of itcl.
On 2008-01-07 13:58-0700 Orion Poplawski wrote:
> Well, Tcl 8.5 has finally landed in Fedora Development again. You can see
> some results from earlier attempts here:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/plplot-devel@li
On 2008-01-08 15:16- Andrew Ross wrote:
> tcl 8.5 is in Debian testing. Unfortunately I don't have easy access to
> this until next week, but if you have not found a solution by then I
> will be able to help. Alan might be able to test things out in the
> meantime - I know he has Debian testin
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 08:43:46AM +0100, Arjen Markus wrote:
> > Well, Tcl 8.5 has finally landed in Fedora Development again. You can
> > see some results from earlier attempts here:
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/plplot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg00440.html
> >
> > I've attached my recreat
> Well, Tcl 8.5 has finally landed in Fedora Development again. You can
> see some results from earlier attempts here:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/plplot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg00440.html
>
> I've attached my recreated attempt to patch to handle it. Again, we
> compile, but the examples
Well, Tcl 8.5 has finally landed in Fedora Development again. You can
see some results from earlier attempts here:
http://www.mail-archive.com/plplot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg00440.html
I've attached my recreated attempt to patch to handle it. Again, we
compile, but the examples don't
Maurice LeBrun wrote:
> I haven't forgotten about this. A priority item once I get any free time.
> Thanks for your initial legwork.
>
Well, much lower priority for me since they have reverted back to Tcl
8.4 in Fedora Development, at least for now.
--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > Maurice LeBrun wrote:
> >> I may be able to look into it over the weekend. If someone beats me to
> >> it, I
> >> won't complain tho. :)
> >>
...
> The compiled pltcl gives the following error at startup:
>
> $ ../utils/pltcl
> Error Tcl_Init
> application-
> Maurice LeBrun wrote:
>> Orion Poplawski writes:
>> > Could the Tcl interface folks take a look at trying to compile plplot
>> > against Tcl 8.5? It's been put into Fedore Development and plplot
>> > compile fails with:
>> > ..
>>
>> I may be able to look into it over the weekend. If someon
On 2007-02-12 17:28-0700 Orion Poplawski wrote:
> Maurice LeBrun wrote:
>> Orion Poplawski writes:
>> > Could the Tcl interface folks take a look at trying to compile plplot
>> > against Tcl 8.5? It's been put into Fedore Development and plplot >
>> compile fails with:
>> > ..
>>
>> I may b
Maurice LeBrun wrote:
Orion Poplawski writes:
> Could the Tcl interface folks take a look at trying to compile plplot
> against Tcl 8.5? It's been put into Fedore Development and plplot
> compile fails with:
> ..
I may be able to look into it over the weekend. If someone beats me to it,
Orion Poplawski writes:
> Could the Tcl interface folks take a look at trying to compile plplot
> against Tcl 8.5? It's been put into Fedore Development and plplot
> compile fails with:
> ..
I may be able to look into it over the weekend. If someone beats me to it, I
won't complain tho. :)
Could the Tcl interface folks take a look at trying to compile plplot
against Tcl 8.5? It's been put into Fedore Development and plplot
compile fails with:
[ 13%] Building C object
bindings/tcl/CMakeFiles/plplottcltkd.dir/__/__/__/bindings/tk/tkMain.o
/usr/bin/gcc -Dplplottcltkd_EXPORTS -O2 -
26 matches
Mail list logo
